Altus. Abide With Me by Simon Dewey:
https://altusfineart.com/products/simon-dewey-abide-with-me-jesus-with-open-arms
When I first started this blog, I wanted to investigate whether or not the founder of Christianity was real. If Jesus Christ was a real historical person, and the Son of God, then that would mean that my religion was valid and I have no reason to doubt anymore. However, after five years now, I have come to the conclusion that a lot of what I thought supported my original beliefs about Christianity aren't set in stone, or they're not true. Carefully, we're going to investigate the person of Jesus and see which version (yes, version) of Jesus was real.
Part 1: Who was Jesus?
1.1. The Jesus of the New Testament:
I believe that we all know who Jesus Christ is by now, even if you aren't religious anymore or wasn't religious to begin with. I'll give a brief overview:
Links:
Matthew 1:18-25:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/1.htm
Matthew 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/2.htm
Matthew 3:13-17:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/3.htm
Matthew 16:13-18:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/16.htm
Matthew 28:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/28.htm
Mark 8:27-30:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/8.htm
Mark 14:43-72:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/14.htm
Mark 15:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/15.htm
Luke 1:26-38:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/1.htm
Luke 2:1-20:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/2.htm
John 3:16:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/3.htm
John 5:39-47:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/5.htm
John 14:7-11:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/14.htm
John 18:28-40:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/18.htm
John 19:
1.2. Jesus' Real Name:
In my "The Demonic Deity Unveiled" post, I learned that the real name of the god of the Jews, Yhvh, is Ieue. I did this by using the paleo-Hebrew alphabet. Now, Strong's Greek said that Jesus' name in Greek is "Iesous." Iesous is the Greek translation of the name Joshua (Bible Hub, Strong's Greek: 2424. Iesous). Another spelling is "Iesou" (Matthew 1:1 [Interlinear]). In modern Hebrew, Joshua is spelled as "Yehoshua." The name means "Jehovah-saved" (Bible Hub, Strong’s Hebrew: 3091. Yehoshua, Lexical Summary and Strong's Hebrew Concordance), or "'the LORD is salvation,'" (NAS Exhaustive Concordance). In paleo-Hebrew, the name is spelled "Ieushuo" (pronounced "I-u-shu"). Ieushou is true spelling of Jesus. However, it seems that Ieushuo was a later spelling of the name. In Numbers 13:8, Joshua son of Nun's original name was Hoshea. However, Moses called Hosea Joshua (Numbers 13:16). Using the paleo-Hebrew method, Hoshea is Eusho (pronounced "E-u-sho") (see Bible Hub, Strong's Hebrew. 1954. Hoshea). The name means "deliverer" (Bible Hub, Strong's Hebrew. 1954. Hoshea, Lexical Summary and Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), or "salvation" (NAS Exhaustive Concordance). The root word for the name is yasha (isho) (Lexical Summary), which also means "To save, deliver, rescue, bring to safety," (Bible Hub, Strong's Hebrew. 3467. yasha). At best, Eusho means "deliverer" and Ieushuo means "Ieue's deliverer."
Links:
Bible Hub. Strong’s Hebrew. 3091. Yehoshua:
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/3091.htm
Bible Hub. Strong’s Greek. 2424: Iesous:
https://biblehub.com/greek/2424.htm
Matthew 1:1 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/1-1.htm
The Demonic Deity Unveiled:
https://demythifyinggod.blogspot.com/2022/10/was-yhwh-yahwehjehovah-angel.html
Numbers 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/numbers/13.htm
Bible Hub. Strong’s Hebrew. 1954. Hoshea:
https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1954.htm
Bible Hub. Strong's Hebrew. 3467. yasha:
1.3. What Jesus Might've Looked Like:
Jesus' Portrait (Fillon, 2002 [2020 edition]):
Jesus' Baptismal Portrait from Byzantine Church (Borschel-Dan, 2018):
The Shroud of Turin by Diego Barbieri (Mauro, 2022):
Finally, we have the Shroud of Turin. This object is an "ancient linen cloth, 4.4 m long and 1.1 m wide," has "the image of a tortured man" with scars coinciding with someone who went through Jesus' crucifixion process. There has been much debate about its dating. Recently, De Caro et al., (2022) did an x-ray scan of the Shroud. Apparently, the results date the Shroud back to 2,000 years ago when Jesus Christ was suppose to have been alive (Abstract; Introduction, para. 1; X-Ray Dating of the TS Sample, para. 8-9; Conclusions, para. 3; Figures 2-3 and 5) (Mauro, 2022, WAXS Dating, para. 1-2).
Dating of the Shroud (De Caro et al., 2022, Abstract):
Dating of the Shroud (Mauro, 2022, WAXS Dating, para. 1-2):The Shroud shows Jesus with long flowing hair coming down to his shoulders, and with a mustache and beard. Interestingly, this goes against "the earliest pictures of him" in which "his hair is short" (Schonfield, 1974, The Nazorean Scribes). This definitely goes against the depiction of him found in 2020, where he has short curly hair and a long nose (Day, 2020, para. 24). If the earliest depictions of Jesus do not match the Shroud, then it seems that the Shroud of Turin doesn't isn't authentic. The Shroud is discussed further below.Ruth Schuster (2018):
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-jesus-face-discovered-in-ancient-negev-church-1.6640744
Amanda Borschel-Dan (2018):
https://www.timesofisrael.com/jesus-image-hidden-in-plain-sight-at-negev-church-is-one-of-earliest-in-israel/
https://nypost.com/2018/11/14/rare-painting-of-jesus-face-discovered-in-ancient-church/
https://aleteia.org/2022/04/22/new-technology-suggests-shroud-of-turin-is-2000-years-old/
De Caro et al., (2022):
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47
Schonfield (1974) (The Nazorean Scribes):
Edwards et al., (1986), who published an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), says that Jesus, given the way He is described during his execution, was indeed dead when he was removed from the cross (Abstract).
In 2012, Steven A. Austin stated that an earthquake took place in 33 A.D., based on "superb mud laminae exposures." This earthquake was strong enough to destroy the western side of the Temple Mount, and the temple's curtain was torn (Abstract). The temple in question is the Second Jewish Temple. There's a picture of the temple in Ernest L. Martin's book, Secrets of Golgotha (2007) (p. 84). This also point towards Jesus' death occurring in 33 A.D.
Second Jewish Temple/Temple Mount (Reconstruction):
Aside from the earthquake, the land went dark after Jesus died, as stated in the Matthew 27: 45. In secular sources, Thallus (52 A.D.), a historian, reported the events of an eclipse. This was quoted by Julius Africanus in 221 A.D. (Wallace, 2017), which was then quoted by George Syncellus in the 9th century in his book, Chronography:
"A most terrible darkness fell over all the world, the rocks were torn apart by an earthquake, and many places both in Judaea and the rest of the world were thrown down. In the third book of his Histories Thallus dismisses this darkness as a solar eclipse, unreasonably, as it seems to me," Chronography, 9th Century A.D., Chapter 391. (Translated by Ben C. Smith in 2019)
This is the earliest documentation of the darkness and earthquake outside of the Gospels. Phlegon (140 A.D.) (Wallace, 2017), as stated by St. Jerome in his book, Chronicle, in 380 A.D. (Roger Pearse, 2005), wrote this about the darkness:
"Indeed Phlegon, who is an excellent calculator of olympiads, also writes about this, in his 13th book writing thus: 'However in the fourth year of the 202nd olympiad, an eclipse of the sun happened, greater and more excellent than any that had happened before it; at the sixth hour, day turned into dark night, so that the stars were seen in the sky, and an earthquake in Bithynia toppled many buildings of the city of Nicaea.' These things the aforementioned man (says)," Chronicle, 380 A.D., pp. 256-258, 202nd Olympiad, 19.
Going by these two quotes, and Austin (2012), the darkness and earthquake both occurred on 33 A.D.
Once again, this follows what Matthew said in his Gospel:
"From the sixth hour until the ninth hour darkness came over all the land... At that moment the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth quaked and the rocks were split," (27:45 and 51).
I remember, back around 2016 or so, that the National Geographic Museum in Washington D.C. had an exhibit explored on the tomb of Jesus Christ. It was an interactive tour. The real tomb, as stated by Kim (2017), is located "in Jerusalem's Old City." The tomb is located inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (para. 2). Inside the church, the tomb is held inside a shrine or Edicule. The tomb was discovered by Constantine's mother Helena in 327 A.D. The shrine is said to have been made by the Romans to protect the tomb (Jarus, 2017, para. 3). Interestingly, scientists tested pieces of mortar from a limestone bed that is said to have been where the body of Jesus was laid (para. 4). The mortar has been dated back to 345 A.D. (Jarus, 2017, para. 5) (Kim, 2017, para. 5), which is about 1,700 years ago (Kim, 2017, para. 6) and just after Constantine's death in 337 A.D. (Jarus, 2017, para. 3 and 5) (Nicole and Matthews, 1999, para. 1). Therefore, it is a possibility that this is the actual tomb of Jesus Christ. Maybe not entirely conclusive, but it's still a possibility.
Links:
Steven A. Austin (2012):
Ernest L. Martin. Secrets of Golgotha. 2007. P. 84:
J. Warner Wallace (2017). "Is There Any Evidence for Jesus Outside the Bible?":
Phlegon (140 A.D.):
https://www.today.com/news/test-results-reveal-age-tomb-where-jesus-christ-was-reportedly-t119338
Owen Jarus (2017):
https://www.livescience.com/61043-tomb-of-jesus-excavated.html
Nicole and Matthews (2019):
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Constantine-I-Roman-emperor
Jesus' actual flesh and blood (Lanciano Eucharistic Miracle) (The Real Presence, Eucharistic Miracle):I'm never going to look at Communion the same way ever again!
Let's go back to the Shroud of Turin for a second. It's suppose to be the "burial cloth of Jesus." There is also a "facecloth or napkin" belonging to Jesus that is "referenced in the Gospel of John." It's called "the Sudarium of Oviedo" (Kearse, 2019, p. 1). Dreschnack (2023) said that the Sudarium was wrapped around Jesus' head "as he was removed from the cross," (p. 19). Both of these relics have type AB or AB+ blood on them (Kearse, 2019, p. 1) (Dreschnack, 2023, p. iii). When I checked the Gospel of John, it seems that the Sudarium is mentioned in John 20:7. However, I noticed something else. The "face-cloth" that covered Jesus' head was separate from the "linen wrappings" in Jesus' tomb (John 20:6-7). The linen wrappings were wrapped around Jesus' body before he was buried (John 19:40-41). Notice how it was multiple wrappings of linen, not a single piece of linen like the Shroud of Turin. In Luke 24, the linen wrappings are mentioned again but the face cloth isn't (Luke 24:12). Interestingly, Jesus's body was "wrapped [...] in a linen cloth" in Luke 23:53. In Luke 24:12, the linen cloth is in pieces. The burial cloth/wrappings of Jesus should be in multiple pieces, not as a single piece. A single linen cloth is mentioned in Matthew 27:59 and Mark 15:46, but it's never mentioned again after Jesus resurrects (Matthew 28) (Mark 16). Does this mean that the Shroud of Turin is false? Based on what the gospels say, the answer is yes. Nobody collected the burial wrappings, nor do any of the gospels state that an image of Jesus' body was seen on the wrappings. More importantly, there isn't a single intact piece of burial cloth left behind. It's either in pieces, or Jesus' body was wrapped in pieces of linen to begin with. As stated previously, the image of Jesus on the Shroud doesn't match the earliest depictions of him at archaeological sites. The Sudarium of Oviedo is also not the face cloth of Jesus, since the blood stains on it has the same blood type as the Shroud and no one collects the face cloth in the gospels either. Also, the face cloth is only mentioned in John's gospel.
I want to also talk about the "true cross." There are fragments of the true cross that Jesus supposedly died on all over the place. There's something fishy about how much there is though. According to McKinley (2015), Emperor Constantine sent his mother, Helena, to look for the true cross (para. 7). They found it after Helena tested three crosses by using a sick woman. The sickly woman touched the third cross, and was healed (para. 10). For some reason, Helena "carved it up," and took a part of it back home while the rest remained in Jerusalem (para. 11). WHY!? It would've been better to have the while thing! Anyway, the "chunk" that Helena took back "seemingly multiplied" so much so that John Calvin said that there was enough to "'make a big ship-load,'" (para. 11). Later on in 1870, "French architect Charles Rohault de Fleury" gathered all the pieces of the true cross that were documented, and said that "they wouldn't amount to a third of the cross on which Jesus died on." He speculated that Jesus' cross was "three or four meters high, with a cross beam two meters wide." It would've "weighed 165 pounds," (para. 14-15). Not only that, it's unknown what kind of wood the cross was made of. Some fragments analyzed by Fleury were made of pine wood. Other fragments said to have come from the true cross were examined by scientists later on, and their results said that the fragments were made of olive wood (para. 15-16). One fragment that was suppose to have been in a chest mysteriously vanished in 2013 (para. 1-4). We can't even tell what kind of wood the cross would've been made of....
We have all of these holy relics and miraculous artifacts, yet they are very sketchy if not flat-out false when you really dig deep into them. This also makes wonder: if Jesus can turn the Eucharist into actual flesh and blood, why can't he come back to Earth and stop the many ailments that harm us, stop crime, appear to all of the Atheists and Agnostics and turn them into believers, etc.? This all smells like false claims to me, not truth. I can't say that these so-called holy relics make me a believer.
Links:
http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/lanciano.html
HFBG. Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano:
https://hfgb.org/wp-content/uploads/Eucharisitc-Miracle-Lanciano.pdf
Kearse (2019):
https://www.academia.edu/39142967/The_Shroud_of_Turin_the_Relics_of_Jesus_and_Eucharistic_Miracles_The_Significance_of_Type_AB_blood
McKinley (2013):
https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/23/living/jesus-true-cross
Dreschnack (2023):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/20.htm
John 19:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/19.htm
Luke 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/24.htm
Luke 23:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/23.htm
Matthew 27:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/27.htm
Matthew 28:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/28.htm
Mark 15:
1.6. Historical References to Jesus Christ?
1. Flavius Josephus (37-101 A.D):
Photo by Whiston (1850):
"...the brother of Jesus who was called Christ, whose name was James..." Antiquities of the Jews, 93 A.D., Book XX (20) Chapter 9 Verse 1.
Here is the best quote about Jesus:
McDowell and Wilson (2011) (p. 42):
McDowell and Wilson (2011) give another translation of the passage here (p. 41):
Josephus also mentions John the Baptist, Jesus' cousin:
"...John, that was called the baptist. For Herod slew him [About Feb. A.D. 32.]..." Antiquity of the Jews, Book XVIII (18), Chapter 5, Verse 2.
It seems that we can also conclude that Jesus, James, and John the Baptist were real people... However, it seems that that is not so easily the case. It seems that these passages in Josephus have been criticized as being Christian forgeries for over a hundred years! In fact, it seems that Josephus never even knew about Jesus... According to Massey (1883 [2000 edition]), Josephus' passages on Jesus were “manifestly interpolated between the two calamities that befell the Jews. Besides which, Photius states explicitly that Josephus made no mention of Jesus Christ.” Massey names "Another Jewish historian" named Justin Tiberias. Tiberias never mentioned Jesus either (p. 191). Allen (2020) said that Josephus never knew Jesus, John the Baptist, or James the Just (mentioned as Jesus' brother in Josephus' book) (p. 5), and never wrote the passage on Jesus in Book XVIII (18) Chapter 3 Verse 3 (called the "Testimonium Flavianum") (p. 105). The passage was created by Christians (p. 135). This goes for "the Arabic and Slavic versions" as well (p. 143). In fact, Allen said that the Christian Church Father Eusebius created the Testimonium Flavianum! The passages on James, and John the Baptist, in Josephus' book were created by the Church Father Origen (p. 297). Josephus turned against the Jews, and probably "made prophetic statements about Vespasian." He wouldn't have called Jesus the "Christ" because Jesus was Jewish (pp. 107 and 121). Vespasian was a Roman emperor from the first century A.D. (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vespasian, para. 1). As for Origen, he stated twice that Josephus never called Jesus "Christ" (p. 131). Baras (1987) stated this too (pp. 338-340). I found one of the statements of Origen in his book Against Celsus (Book 1, Ch. 47):
Links:
Whiston (1850):
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Works-Flavius-Josephus-Legendary/dp/0890515492
Flavius Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews, 93 A.D., Book XX (20), Chapter 9, Verse 1:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-20.html
Flavius Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews, 93 A.D., Book XVIII (18), Chapter 3, Verse 3:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-18.html
Flavius Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews, 93 A.D., Book XVIII (18), Chapter 5, Verse 2:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-18.html
Shlomo Pines (1971) (pg. 16):
http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/pines01.pdf
McDowell and Wilson (2011) (pg. 39-42):
https://books.google.com/books?id=qJDkkQT8oOQC&pg=PA4&dq=He+Walked+Among+Us,+Josh+McDowell,+Bill+Wilson,+Here%27s+Life+Publishers&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiq0Lm36djkAhUIV8AKHfyoB2MQ6AEwAHoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=josephus&f=false
J. Warner Wallace (2017). "Is There Any Evidence for Jesus Outside the Bible?":
https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible/
Christopher Klein (2019):
https://www.history.com/news/was-jesus-real-historical-evidence
Massey (1883 [2000 edition]) (P. 191):
Allen (2020) (P. 298):
Baras (1987) (PP. 338-340; in Feldman and Hata, 1987):
Origen. Against Celsus. Book 1 Ch. 47:
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/04161.htm
Smith (1910):
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vespasian:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vespasian
Photo of a Tacitus "statue at the Parliament building from Vienna" (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Tacitus): Tacitus (55-120 A.D) was a Roman historian who wrote The Annals in 116 A.D., according to Wallace (2017). When he wrote about Nero persecuting the Christians, he stated the reason for why the Christians were being killed:
"...Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular," The Annals, 15.44, 116 A.D.
This passage mentions Jesus' name ("Christus"), that he was the leader of the Christians and died under Pontius Pilate, and that after he was killed the Christians continued to spread the name of Jesus.
Smith (1910) said that Tacitus' passage could've been authentic, but states that the passage was more likely a Christian forgery (pp. 12 and 32). More importantly, Smith said that none of the Christian writers cited any of these sources. This points towards the conclusion that these passages on Jesus, like Josephus' and Tacitus', didn't exist originally (p. 33).
Links:
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Tacitus:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tacitus-Roman-historian
Tacitus. The Annals. 116 A.D, 15.44:http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0078%3Abook%3D15%3Achapter%3D44
J. Warner Wallace (2017). "Is There Any Evidence for Jesus Outside the Bible?":
https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible/
Massey (1883 [2000 edition]) (P. 191):
Allen (2020) (P. 105 note 146):
Smith (1910):
According to Dr. Nelson L. Price and J. Warner Wallace, Mara Bar-Serapion was a Syrian philosopher that lived in the first century A.D. As stated by those two, along with Peter Kirby, in 73 A.D, Mara Bar-Serapion wrote a letter to his son:
"What benefit did the Athenians obtain by putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as judgment for their crime. Or, the people of Samos for burning Pythagoras? In one moment their country was covered with sand. Or the Jews by murdering their wise king?…After that their kingdom was abolished. God rightly avenged these men… The wise king… Lived on in the teachings he enacted," (taken from J. Warner Wallace's website).
The original letter is in the British Museum, according to Price and Vocab Malone.
Mara Bar-Serapion's Letter (from Malone's blog):
According to Allen (2020), Mara bar Serapion (73 A.D.) "was supposedly a Stoic philosopher, possibly a monotheist but certainly not a Jew or Christian," (p. 52). Regarding the letter, the "'wise king'" mentioned in it is stated to be Jesus. However, Allen said that "Serapion does not provide independent confirmation of the historicity of Jesus. Consequentially, his testimony is worthless." He also condemns some other scholars that stated otherwise (pp. 13, 54, and 97). The "'wise king'" mentioned by Serapion isn't Jesus (pp. 55 and 97). Jesus was "not a king in a secular sense," so the "'wise king'" mentioned in the letter couldn't be him. It could even refer to another person, and event. Second, Allen said that the letter seems to state that "the Jews were removed from their land the very moment their 'Wise King' was murdered (i.e. 'from that very time')." Some scholars stated that this was the fall of the Jerusalem Temple, but that's not correct because the temple fell in 68-70 A.D. Jesus died in 30-33 A.D. Also, Jews were removed from the land even before the temple fell. In totality, the letter isn't very accurate to history (p. 55):Also, the letter in the British Museum is a 6th-7th-century copy (p. 53). Is there a possibility that the letter, or parts of it, is a forgery? McGill and Watts (2018) said that the mention of the "'wise king'"/Jesus in Serapion's letter, which itself dates from the 1st-4th century A.D., is of "Christian origin" (in McGill and Watts, 2018, Introduction, 3.5. Rhetoric and Epistolography). Mckinsey (2000), in their critique of the letter, said that Jesus wasn't a king, he was executed by the Romans and the Jews, "no part of this passage clearly applies to Jesus," and Mckinsey questions whether or not the Jews killed only one king (p. 312). I do not consider Serapion's mention of the "'wise king'" to be Jesus.
Links:
Mckinsey (2000) (P. 312):
https://books.google.com/books?id=U62kafWMCbYC&pg=PA311&dq=Mara+bar+serapion+forgery&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiq1MrFp-6PAxUTD1kFHYDQAB4Q6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=Mara%20bar%20serapion%20forgery&f=false
Dr. Nelson L. Price (2006):
https://www.nelsonprice.com/early-secular-writings-regarding-christ/
Vocab Malone (2013):
https://streetapologist.wordpress.com/2013/09/20/mara-bar-serapion-on-jesus/
J. Warner Wallace (2017):
https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible/
McGill and Watts (2018; in McGill and Watts, 2018) (Introduction, 3.5. Rhetoric and Epistolography):
Allen (2020):
Links:
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Qur'an:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Quran
Oxford Islamic Studies Online:
"Jesus, Son of Mary":
http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e1196
3:45-64:
The Noble Quran. Surah Ali 'Imran:
5. The Babylonian Talmud and Toledot Yeshu:
According to Wallace (2017) and Neusner (1970), the Babylonian Talmud was written between the fourth and sixth centuries A.D., and contains the writings and beliefs of the Jewish people. It also contains the "history, ideas and ideals" of Judaism "for the past fifteen centuries" (Neusner, 1970, "Foreward," p. 1). Darmesteter (1897) said that the Talmud explains the culture of the Jews in the times before, and after, the rise of Christianity (The Talmud, translated by Darmesteter, 1897, p. 7, "The Talmud").
This is what the Talmud had to say about Jesus:
"On the even of the Passover Yeshu was hanged (or, "On Passover Eve they hung the corpse of Jesus the Nazarene after they killed him by way of stoning"). For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, 'He (Jesus the Nazarene) is going forth to be stoned because has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy (or, "because he practiced sorcery, incited people to idol worship, and led the Jewish people astray")," (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 43a).
Part 1:Part 2:
The full version of the quote is in Bekkum (2007; in Bekkum et al., 2007) (p. 183):Another version (Peters, 1990, p. 178):Interestingly, the quote says that Jesus was alive during Caesar Augustus' lifetime. He was alive from 63 B.C. to 14 A.D. (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Augustus, para. 1). Admittedly, this goes against the dates for Jesus ben Pandira given by Massey.
As to how old Jesus was when he was being taught be Joshuah ben Perahia, Rev. Wolff (1828) said that Jesus "was already grown in years when he became a disciple of Joshuah ben Perahia," (Vol. 2 p. 109). According to the Jewish Virtual Library, the story of Joshua ben Perahyah and Jesus is an "aggadah" in the Babylonian Talmud. This is "an enlarged reworking of an earlier aggadah concerning Joshua b. Tabbai and one of his unknown pupils of unknown name when they were about to return from Alexandria to Jerusalem," (Joshua ben Perahyah, para. 2). There also seems to be a strategic reason as to why Jesus was made a disciple of Joshuah ben Perahyah. Alexander (1999) said that Jesus and Joshua going to Alexander, Egypt is due to Egypt being "closely associated in Rabbinic literature with sorcery." Jesus is accused of being a sorcerer in the Talmud. Second, Joshua ben Perahyah was an exorcist, so Jesus replaced Joshua b. Tabbai in the story (in Dunn, 1999, p. 18).
It doesn't get much better for the Toledot Yeshu either. In the book, Miriam (Mary) was a "relative" of Queen Helene (Meerson and Schafer, 2014, Vol. 1 p. 323). Bear with me for a sec: this is Helene of Adiabene from the first century A.D. She replaced Salome Alexandra by the Slavic A author of the Slavic A version of Toledot Yeshu. Salome was the real wife of Yannai (Jannaeus). Helene is put in the Slavic A version to make Jesus live in the first century A.D. The Italian version of the book has Jesus born in 90 B.C., during the reign of Yannai. Slavin B has 33-32 B.C. The 90-B.C. date seems to be symbolic, making Jesus represent the Pharisees who survived persecution by Yannai (pp. 43-44). There are multiple versions of the book, and different individuals are put in it to fix a date for Jesus.
The ancient writer Celsus spoke against Christianity, and said that the real Jesus was different (Early Christian Writings, Celsus as quoted by Origen, Jesus and the Jewish Critic). His work is dated to 177-178 A.D. (Early Christian Writings, Celsus). However, according to Larson (1980), the Jesus that Celsus is talking about is the Jesus of Toledot Yeshu (p. 151). The Church Father Epiphanius (315-403 A.D.) (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Saint Epiphanius of Constantia, para. 1) said that Jesus was born in Bethlehem during the reign of Alexander and Salina/Alexandra (The Panarion [Williams, 2009 edition], Book 1 Section 29:3.3-3.6). How interesting. It seems that Celsus and Epiphanius knew about Toledot Yeshu, which means that the story of Jesus told in the Toledot Yeshu might've been around since the second century A.D.
It seemed that this version of Jesus couldn't help me anymore, but this was a premature judgement call. Eisler (1931) wrote a detailed book about Jesus, and John the Baptist. In it, he mentions that "Paul was confused, in particular, with the so-called 'Egyptian,' the messiah who had assembled some thousands of the messianists dispersed by Felix on their attempted exodus, and had suddenly appeared with them on the Mount of Olives. He said that he would make "the walls of Jerusalem" topple "before him, as those of Jericho had once fallen before Joshua, he, too, must have given himself out as the returning 'Joshua.'" Eisler stated that this was a man named "Simon of Gitta, the 'Jesus' son of Sotades" who was later "stoned and hanged at Lydda" by the Jews for trying to convert the Jews into the "worship of foreign gods." Eisler's notes said that this Jesus son of Sotades was mentioned in Shabbat f. 104b and Shabbat 43d (pp. 582-583; p. 583 note 2). Jesus son of Sotades is Jesus ben Stada/Pandeira (The Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 104b:5)! Eisler might've just saved my hypothesis! Eisler's source for equating Jesus ben Stada to the "Egyptian" is Herford (Eisler, 1931, p. 583 note 2). Herford (1903) believed that Jesus ben Stada, and Jesus ben Notzri, were separate individuals. Therefore, he estimated that Jesus ben Stada was the "Egyptian." Jesus ben Stada is the one that practiced sorcery he learned from Egypt (p. 345 note 1). He believed that Jesus ben Pantiri/Pandiri/Pandera was Jesus ben Notzri (pp. 345-346).
Another scholar who supports the equation of Jesus to the "Egyptian" is Dr. Lena Einhorn. Einhorn (2016) said that Jesus probably didn't leave Egypt until he was an adult. This could be supported with the Talmud (p. 97). Einhorn then stated that Origen agreed that some of Celsus' comments about Jesus were correct, and that Arnobius of Sicca said there were comments about Jesus being as a magician from Egypt. She also mentioned that other Church Fathers used the story of Pandira (pp. 101-102). We've seen this with Epiphanius. As to Jesus staying in Egypt until he was 30, Einhorn said that the Talmud, Celsus, and the early Christian Fathers could be used to support this hypothesis. This can explain why there aren't any documented events in the life of Jesus before he matured (p. 104). In her earlier paper, Einhorn demonstrates that the Egyptian was defeated in the 50's A.D. (Einhorn, 2012, p. 15 Figure 4). Also, she states that "The proceeding messianic leader" to Jesus/"Egyptian" is a man called "Theudas," who "shares distinct characteristics with John the Baptist." Josephus mentions Theudas (p. 2), and the "Egyptian" (p. 16). Celsus did say that Jesus started his movement "a few years ago," (Early Christian Writings, Celsus as quoted by Origen, Jesus and the Jewish Critic, Book 1 Section 26). Since Celsus' work is dated to the second century, this could refer to the first century. I smell smoke!
Eisler (1931) said that Paul was mistaken for the "Egyptian" in Acts 21:38 (p. 582 note 4). This is true. The "Egyptian" is a figure "who some time ago stirred up a revolt and led the four thousand men of the Assassins out into the wilderness." Paul denied the accusation (Acts 21:38-40).
1.) Tractate Sanhedrin Folio 43a ("AND A HERALD PROCEEDS HIM etc."):
-V2:
Tractate Sanhedrin a ("AND A HERALD PROCEEDS HIM etc."):
http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/judaism/sanhedrin43a-eng.html
-V3 (Sefaria):
Sanhedrin 43 a (The William Davidson Talmud, "The mishna teaches that..." paragraph, under "Gemara: Abaye says:" paragraph):
https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.43a?lang=bi
-V4 (Chabad):
Sanhedrin 43a (Gemara: Abaye says, para. 2 to end):
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5458159/jewish/43a.htm
2.) Shabbat 104b:5:
https://www.sefaria.org/Shabbat.104b.5
3.) Sotah: 47a:
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5452790/jewish/47a.htm
Jacob Neusner. The Formation of the Babylonian Talmud. 1970. ("Foreward," p. 1):
https://books.google.com/books?id=c-lKAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PR10&dq=talmud%20primary&pg=PR9#v=onepage&q=%22primary%20source%20for%20Jewish%20law%22&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=dLxFo4zNEMQC&lpg=PT6&dq=steinsaltz%20essential%20talmud&pg=PT7#v=onepage&q=%22primary%20source%20of%20Jewish%20law%22&f=false
Toledot Yeshu (Meerson and Schafer, 2014 edition). Volume 1:
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Toledot_Yeshu_The_Life_Story_of_Jesus/81hHsItgjqIC?hl=en
Huldrich (1705) (Synopsis):
https://www.kestenbaum.net/auction/lot/auction-16/016-139/
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apostasy
Jewish Virtual Library. Moses Maimonides (Rambam):
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Maimonides.html
Melachim uMilchamot. Ch. 11 Section 4:
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188356/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-11.htm
Matthew 21:1-11:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/21.htm
Galatians 3:13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/galatians/3.htm
Deuteronomy 21:22-23:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/deuteronomy/21.htm
Norris (2016):
Al-Qirqisani, Ya'qub . The Book of Lights and Watchtowers (10th century A.D. [Cheisa and Lockwood, 1984 edition]) (P. 102):
https://books.google.com/books?id=TV8wAAAAYAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=pandera
https://www.mythicistpapers.com/2020/10/24/a-new-account-pt-12-family-ties-and-a-correction/
Rev. Wolff (1828) (Vol. 2 p. 109):
https://books.google.com/books?id=xVQNhNUeEH4C&pg=PA108&dq=jesus+and+perahia+in+alexandria+egypt&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTuf_d2P6GAxVAF1kFHXYWDPAQ6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q=jesus%20and%20perahia%20in%20alexandria%20egypt&f=false
Bekkum (2007; in Bekkum et al., 2007) (P. 183):
https://books.google.com/books?id=O-GCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA178&dq=joshua+ben+perahiah+uncle+of+Jesus&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjp4IPL04GQAxUQMlkFHRD5Gr0Q6AF6BAgMEAM#v=onepage&q=joshua%20ben%20perahiah%20uncle%20of%20Jesus&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Augustus:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Augustus-Roman-emperor/Military-successes
Jewish Virtual Library. Joshua ben Perahyah:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/joshua-ben-pera-x1e25-yah
Alexander (1999; in Dunn, 1999) (P. 18):
https://books.google.com/books?id=9zCh9SBb6Y8C&pg=PA18&dq=Judah+b.+Tabbai+is+Jesus+Christ&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibtanS2oGQAxXyF2IAHXI2O64Q6AF6BAgMEAM#v=onepage&q=Judah%20b.%20Tabbai%20is%20Jesus%20Christ&f=false
Early Christian Writings. Celsus as quoted by Origen:
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/celsus.html
Early Christian Writings. Celsus:
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/celsus.html
Larson (1980):
https://archive.org/details/essenechristianf0000lars/page/154/mode/2up?q=teacher+righteousness+Yeshu&view=theater
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Saint Epiphanius of Constantia:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Epiphanius-of-Constantia
Epiphanius. The Panarion (Williams, 2009 edition) (Book 1, 99, 4.9 [p. 126]):
-V2:
Eisler (1931):
https://archive.org/details/themessiahjesusand/page/n17/mode/1up
Einhorn (2012):
http://lenaeinhorn.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Jesus-and-the-Egyptian-Prophet-12.11.25.pdf
Einhorn (2016):
Acts 21:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/21.htm
Herford (1903) (PP. 345-346):
P. 253:
-Both Judah and Jesus claimed to be “a prophet, and more than a prophet.”
P. 254:2.) Both individuals taught the same things.
3.) Both were said to have been predicted to arrive and perform wonders.
4.) Both were rejected (mostly) by the Jews, especially by the Pharisees and “priestly families.”
5.) Both were “tried before the council and sentenced to die.”
6.) Both said Jerusalem would be destroyed by the Romans. This is due to rejection of his teachings. (Also stated on p. 42)
7.) Both started movements that are still extant today.
8.) Both were the “Suffering Servant, the Messiah, Good Shepherd, and other figures foretold by scripture.” (Also stated on p. 174)
9.) Both said their sufferings were for “atonement” (of sins). (Also on p. 212)
10.) Both are said to “sat at the right hand of God.”
11.) Both are said to return, and their followers will rule the world.
I thought that Jesus being a Zadokite was settled until I saw some things that made me question this decision. According to Thomas (2011), Elizabeth, the relative of the Virgin Mary, was a descendant of Aaron. This means that Mary, Jesus, and by extension Joseph, were Levites. Jesus being a Jew/descendant of David seems to have been "an afterthought," (Toledoth Yeshu [Kindle version]). In Luke 1, Elizabeth is stated as being from the "daughters of Aaron" (Luke 1:5). So, yeah, one of Jesus' relatives was a Levite. We don't know much about Mary's lineage in the gospels, but she is Elizabeth's "relative" (Luke 1:36). Perhaps she is a Levite too? In the Toledot Yeshu, Miriam (Mary) was a "relative" of Queen Helene (Meerson and Schafer, 2014, Vol. 1 p. 323). Bear with me for a sec: this is Helene of Adiabene from the first century A.D. She replaced Salome Alexandra by the Italian author of one of the versions of Toledot Yeshu. Salome was the real wife of Yannai (Jannaeus) (pp. 43-44). If Mary was a relative of the Hasmonean Salome (not Helene), then this supports Mary, and Jesus by association, being Levites. Finally, Mary is a "sister of Aaron" in the Quran. In the Khattab translation, this is explained as Mary being a "descendant" of Aaron (Quran [Khattab translation], Surah 19. Maryam, 19:28):At this point, I believe that Jesus/Teacher of Righteousness was a Levite. This matches some of the sources mentioned previously. He wasn't a Jew, an Israelite, or a Zadokite Jebusite. This is actually important because the Dead Sea Scrolls stated that the people of Qumran expected one or two Messiahs. According to Ellegard, one Messiah comes from the line of Aaron, and the other is a King Messiah. However, it later changed to one Messiah coming from both the lines of Aaron and Israel. There's no mention of a Davidic Messiah being emphasized in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Ellegard, 1998 [2011 edition], pp. 100-101). Surprisingly, this means that the Essenes didn't expect a Davidic Messiah. They expected an Aaronic (Levite), or an Aaronic/Israelite, Messiah.
There's one more group of people that we have to talk about before we're done: The Ebionites. According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Ebionites were "an early ascetic sect of Christians" from the first century A.D. The root word for the group is "ebyonim, or ebionim ('the poor')." Interestingly, their belief systems "were anticipated in the teachings of the earlier Qumran sect, as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls." They believed that Jesus was a normal human being (the biological son of Joseph and Mary), and that "Jesus became the Messiah because he obeyed the Jewish Law." They believed that Jesus was the Messiah, and the "true 'prophet' mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:15," (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ebionite, para. 1 and 3). Interestingly, the people of Qumran called themselves ebionim (Theiring, 1992, p. 63) (Eisenman, 1998, Ch. 11: James' Vegetarianism, Abstention from Blood, and Consuming No Wine: The Sons or Daughters of the Rechabites as High Priests [p. 2]). (Lapham, 2003, p. 29) (Tabor, 12/29/15, para. 5-7). (Seccombe, 2022, p. 26). According to Theiring (1992), Jesus' father Joseph, and his brother James, were Essenes. James was also an Ebionite (p. 63). She also stated that the name "Miriam" was also a title given to women who were Essenes. These women were prophetesses, who took "part in the liturgies of orders like the Therapeutae," (pp. 119-120). In his commentary of the gospels, Harwood (2001) said that Jesus was an Essene and the founder of the Ebionites (p. 656). In his introduction to the Essene Apocalypse (Book of Revelation), Harwood said that Paul's Jesus was different from the Jesus of 2 Corinthians 11:4. This Jesus, Harwood states, was the Righteous Rabbi (Teacher of Righteousness) who was the leader of the Essenes that was killed in 103 B.C. His followers waited for his second coming (p. 707):
Along from the term "Ebionite," Dr. James Tabor said that the Essenes/people of Qumran designated other terms to themselves that the followers of Jesus also called themselves. The Essenes and Jesus Movement called themselves "'The Way,'" "'Nazarenes,'" "the Poor, the Saints, the New Covenanters, Children of Light," and "Yachad-the brotherhood or community, and they referred to themselves as brother and sister," (Tabor, 12/29/15, para. 4-8). According to Charlesworth (1995), the following "terms" are found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and are used by the "Qumranites": "Poor Ones," "Belial," "Sons of Light," "Sons of Dawn, Sons of Darkness," "the Way, the way," "Righteous Teacher," "Holy Ones," among others. Charlesworth said that "'Sons of Light'" was the most used term for the community (in Charlesworth et al., 1995, Vol. 2 pp. xiii and 2). Theiring (1979) said that the Teacher of Righteousness was called "Anointed One," "Holy One," and the "Righteous One" in the texts (p. 80). The reason why I chose these terms in particular is because these are all found in the New Testament. Jesus called his followers sons of light (John 12:36 [Interlinear]). Paul uses the term for his followers as well, as well as sons of day. Sons of day could refer to the Sons of Dawn. Paul also stated that his followers were not sons of darkness, which is another Essene/Qumran term (1 Thessalonians 5:5 [Interlinear]). Jesus' followers are called "the Way" (Acts 24:14 and 22 [Interlinear]), "saints" (Acts 26:10 [Interlinear]), and the "Brotherhood" or "Brothers" (1 Peter 2:17 [Interlinear]) (James 5:19 [Interlinear]). According to Freke and Gandy (2001), the Therapeutae called themselves "'the Way'" as well (p. 12). Jesus is also called the "Holy and Righteous One" (Acts 3:14 [Interlinear]). The Devil is called "Belial" in 2 Corinthians (2 Corinthians 6:15; note h). Clearly, Jesus' followers were members of the Essenes. This is the only conclusion that makes sense, given the information that we have.
Larson (1980) stated that the Jesus of Toledot Yeshu was actually the Teacher of Righteousness (pp. 154-155). However, he believes that Yeshu/Teacher and Jesus were two separate people that later became "intertwined" over time (pp. xvii, and 155). He does state that the later Jesus was an Essene though, and that the Essenes that followed him became Ebionites (pp. xvi-xvii). Interestingly, Larson said that Jesus' entrance into Jerusalem on a donkey, his arrest, and then death, were "conscious re-enactments of the Teacher's" death (pp. xvii and 155). Concerning the Teacher, Larson said that the Essenes saw him as "God himself, appearing as a man in Jerusalem, and that his death was an atoning sacrifice for the elect; that he arose from the grave and returned to heaven; that he would send a representative in a few years; and that he was precisely the kind of Messiah that Jesus at first proclaimed himself to be.” Jesus would later state that he was the promised Messiah, thus filling in the Teacher's shoes in a way, "and proclaimed that in his Second Coming he would conduct the Last Judgement as the all-powerful Son of Man." The Teacher "was killed by the Jewish leaders in 70 B.C." over "doctrinal, ritualistic, and organizational heterodoxy," (p. xvii). Both the Teacher and Yeshu (the Jesus in Toledot Yeshu) were arrested in the Jewish Temple (p. 154). The Teacher was also a prophet (pp. xvii and 155). Jesus was also called a prophet (John 9:17). Finally, Larson (1980) said that the Essenes might've given the Teacher a virgin birth if he was Jesus from Toledot Yeshu, like Matthew and Luke did later on for the Jesus of the gospels. However, Jesus never had a virgin birth originally. He was adopted by God originally in Matthew 3:17, but this was changed later on. The Ebionites originally stated that Jesus was adopted by God (p. 156). With all due respect to Larson, this reaffirms my belief that both the Jesus of the gospels and the one from Toledot Yeshu, and the Teacher of Righteousness, were the same person.
Theiring (1992) stated that the priests and Levites in the Essene community were considered to have been reincarnated gods and angels. This was based on the “pesher,” and used to make “real people and events” look like “visions and miracles.” Joseph was the Holy Spirit, since “lower priests, kings, and princes were ‘spirits.’” The virgin birth comes from the pesher as well. The word "virgin" was also used in the Essene lifestyle (pp. 63-64). I think I'm starting to understand where the original idea of Jesus being a divine being came from. However, as stated by the Ebionites, Jesus/Teacher of Righteousness was a regular human being.
Unfortunately, not everything is as it seems with the Teacher of Righteousness. Vermes (1962 [2004 edition]) said that it was perceived that the Teacher wrote the Hymns and that they were "autobiographical." Vermes said that this was "mere speculation" (p. 84 [downloaded]). Johnson (2022) also stated that the Teacher didn't write the Hymns. The true author is "a Maskil," or "the authority of the office of the Maskil," (in Geyser-Fouche and Collins, 2022, p. 336). However, Vermes still believed that the Teacher was a historical person, even if there were no extra extant references to him (pp. 93-94 [downloaded]). His latter statement isn't agreed upon entirely by other scholars. Ben Zion Wacholder believed that the Teacher "is not a figure of history," (Wacholder, 1999, p. 75).
The clincher for me is that Pardo (2008) conducted an analysis to generate a possible identity for the Teacher of Righteousness. His conclusion is that the Teacher was a composite character, and that the
Taking all the present information in, I'll believe that the Teacher of Righteousness was a composite character for now. With that being said, is there any other character in the Dead Sea Scrolls that could still link to Jesus? Actually, there is. It's also directly linked to the Joshua of the Tanakh/Old Testament.
With the present knowledge that we have now, it seems that the Teacher of Righteousness was a creation rather than a historical individual. However, the name "Joshua" still plays an important role in the Dead Sea Scrolls. According to Mitchell (2016), there is a "Josephite Messiah" prophesied to appear along with three other figures in the Scrolls. These figures are listed in the Scroll "4QTestimonia (4Q175)," which "is a polymessianic testimonium which presents four anticipated redeemer figures." These figures are "a prophet like Moses, a priest, a king, and a Joshua hero, son of Joseph." It seems that "the Judeans and Zadokites" of the first century A.D. "were hoping for a coming ruler called Joseph or Joshua." Joseph and Joshua are names of "Ephraimite patriarchs, not Judahites. They were the forefathers of the hated Samaritans, not of the Jews." And yet, the Judeans called their sons these two names a lot along with the name Jacob/James. Jacob/James was the name of the founder of Israel (p. 103). Mitchell hypothesizes that the Jews and Zadokites called themselves Joseph and Jesus in hopes that one of their sons would be the coming savior. An example of this is the James ossuary (pp. 103-104). As for the Jesus Christ of the gospels, Mitchell said that Jesus being the son of Joseph, or "'Bar Joseph,'" would equate him to being "the Ephraimite Messiah." The Gospel of John seems to indicate this the best (p. 119). Interestingly, Mitchell noted that Jesus "never called himself David's son," and the Gospel of John stated that Jesus wasn't born in David's town (pp. 118-119). Jesus was also called a Samaritan in the gospel, and Jesus never denied it (p. 119). The Messiah ben Joseph was a Galilean Messiah (Synopsis) who comes from Galilee to die “at the gate of Jerusalem.” His death “confounds Satan, atones for sins, and abolished death itself. And then he is raised to life again,” (p. 1). This messiah is found in the Scrolls 4Q372, and presumably 4Q521 (p. 103). Doesn't this messiah, or messiahs, sound familiar? Having this Josephite messiah being a Galilean one makes a lot of sense, since Jesus is a Galilean (Mark 1:9) (Luke 1:26-38), dies for our sins, and comes back to life.
In Numbers 13:8, Hoshea son of Nun was from the tribe of Ephraim. In 1 Kings 12, when the sons of Israel split from the sons of Judah, Jeroboam became the king of Israel. King Rehoboam stayed the king of Judah. King Jeroboam lived "in the hill country of Ephraim," and "built Shechem" there. He seems to have established the worship of two golden calves in Shechem too (1 Kings 12:16-20, and 25-28). Encyclopaedia Britannica said that Ephraim was one of the tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. They, along with nine other tribes, are the ten lost tribes of Israel (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ten Lost Tribes of Israel). Their ancestor, also called Ephraim, was a son of Joseph (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ephraim, para. 1). In Genesis 41, the two sons of Joseph are Manasseh and Ephraim (Genesis 41:50-52).
The "Egyptian" seems to have portrayed himself as a reincarnated Joshua son of Nun. According to Eisler (1931), the "Egyptian" "promised that the walls of Jerusalem would fall before him, as those of Jericho had once fallen before Joshua." As a result, the "Egyptian" "must have given himself out as the returning 'Jesus,'" (p. 583). Brandon (1967) said the "Egyptian Jew" acted "like a second Joshua," proclaiming "that the city's walls would fall at his command and that he would lead his followers in to slaughter the Roman garrison," (pp. 110-111). Lendering (2001) said:
"Like Theudas, the Egyptian prophet took Joshua (the man who made the walls of Jericho fall; Joshua 6.20) as an example. The Roman governor was rightly alarmed: like Joshua and Moses, the Egyptian claimed to lead the Jews to a promised land without enemies. This was clearly a messianic claim, even though Josephus does not mention it,"
In Acts 21:38 (Interlinear), the "Egyptian" is a leader of the assassins called "Sikarion." According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, the "Sicarii (Greek sikarioi, 'dagger men')" were "Extremists among the Zealots turned to terrorism and assassination." The Zealots were a "member of a Jewish sect noted for its uncompromising opposition to pagan Rome and the polytheism it professed." It has been noted that "A few scholars see a possible relationship between the Zealots and the Jewish religious community mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls," (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Zealot). Brandon (1967) said that the people of Qumran were probably Essenes, and that Jesus might've had a connection with the zealots and Essenes since he did not condemn them (p. 327; note 2). The gospels also tried to hide the fact that some of Jesus' disciples were Zealots (p. 324). Finally, the reason why Jesus was killed was for sedition (pp. 328 and 330). Allegro (1979) said that some of the "Essene factions," and the Zealots, had "close links" (pp. 188-189). Acharya S (1999) said that Jesus was a Zealot. Jesus' disciples were Zealots as well. She also quoted the Church Father Origen, who said that "'the' Zealots were a branch that broke off the Essenes," (pp. 211-212 [Ch. 19]). Price (2003) stated that multiple scholars have concluded that Qumran was the home of the Zealots, and he said that there might not even be a difference between the Zealots and Essenes (p. 104). Essentially, the "Egyptian" was an Essene! The Essenes were also the Zealots, or some of them were.
The Essenes expected a hero named Joshua the son of Joseph. This was the Messiah of Ephraim. Perhaps they saw Jesus/"Egyptian" as a reincarnated Joshua? I believe that Jesus/"Egyptian" saw himself as that character. This helps to explain why he's called Ieushuo in the New Testament. We've come full circle now.
Epiphanius. The Panarion (Williams, 2009 edition) (Book 1, 99, 4.9 [p. 126]):
-V2:
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Therapeutae:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Therapeutae
Reber (1872):
Silver (2017) (P. 190):
Dunlap (1894) (PP. 468 and 813):
Baldwin, Cradock, and Jow (1880) (Vol. 114-115, p. 123):
https://books.google.com/books?id=oSqgAAAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA123&dq=ashai+jesus&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiU6JqKqqf9AhVoGFkFHQ5XAdEQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&q=ashai%20jesus&f=false
Acts 14 International Congress of Orientalists (1938) (Vol. 19, p. 512 [Italian]):
Silver (2017) (P. 190):
Luke 4:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/4.htm
Josephus. The Jewish War. Book 2. Ch. 8:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/war-2.html
Matthew 17:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/17.htm
Jewish Virtual Library. Minor Sects:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/minor-sects
-Nazoreans and Ossaeans:
https://www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/NasaraeansAndOssaeans.htm
Acts 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/24.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Mount Carmel:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Mount-Carmel-mountain-ridge-Israel
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Galilee:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Galilee-region-Israel
Mark 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/1.htm
Mark 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/2.htm
Jewish Virtual Library. Teacher of Righteousness:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/teacher-of-righteousness
VanderKam and Flint (2005) (P. 322):
https://books.google.com/books?id=SBMXnB4CRpUC&pg=PA322&dq=essene+teacher+of+righteousness+died+in+65+BC&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilxb2ljPGGAxWfFFkFHeMfB_QQ6AF6BAgMEAM#v=onepage&q=essene%20teacher%20of%20righteousness%20died%20in%2065%20BC&f=false
Wilson (2017) (Part II: The Dead Sea Scrolls 1947-1969: The Scrolls from the Dead Sea 1955, Ch. 5: What Would Renan Have Said? [p. 6]):
Massey (1883 [2000 edition]) (P. 190):
Irenaeus. Against Heresies. Book 2 Ch. 22:
Matthew 26:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/26.htm
Schonfield (1974) (The Nazorean Scribes):
Feather (2005) (Ch. 6. The Archaeological Evidence for Jesus' Life):
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Qumran:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Qumran
https://archive.org/details/firstmessiahinve0000wise/mode/1up?view=theater
Kim (2014) (Ch. 1, p. 1):
https://books.google.com/books?id=HI1_AwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=jesus+the+zadokite&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfnOvkyrGIAxWWEVkFHSrmMdEQ6AF6BAgFEAI#v=onepage&q=jesus%20the%20zadokite&f=false
Acharya S (1999 [2012 edition]) (Ch. 19):
https://books.google.com/books?id=yYlXDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT328&dq=jesus+the+zadokite+acharya+s&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwig1PalzLGIAxVQFlkFHdcuI8oQ6AF6BAgNEAI#v=onepage&q=jesus%20the%20zadokite%20acharya%20s&f=false
-V2 (P. 207 for Ch. 19):
-V3:
https://issuu.com/giulianovalverde/docs/acharya_s_-_the_christ_conspiracy
Ezekiel 44:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/ezekiel/44.htm
John 8:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/8.htm
1 Chronicles 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/2.htm
1 Chronicles 3:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/3.htm
1 Chronicles 4:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/4.htm
1 Chronicles 6:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/6.htm
1 Chronicles 9:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/9.htm
1 Chronicles 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/24.htm
Ezekiel 44:15:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/3.htm
Bible Hub. Topic Bible: Asmoneans:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Maccabees%202&version=NRSVUE
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Pharisee:
Bible Hub. Topical Bible. Assidaeans:
https://biblehub.com/topical/a/assidaeans.htm
Bible Hub. Topical Bible: Pharisees:
https://biblehub.com/topical/p/pharisees.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Hasidean:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hasidean
Bible Hub. Topical Bible: Hasidaeans:
https://biblehub.com/topical/h/hasidaeans.htm
Nitzan (2008; in Reventlow and Hoffman, 2008) (PP. 85-87):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_chronicles/11.htm
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-two-kingdoms-of-israel
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Ebionite:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ebionites
Theiring (1992) (P. 63):
https://archive.org/details/jesusman0000thie/page/63/mode/1up?q=Miriam+Essene
Harwood (2001) (P. 656):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/2_corinthians/11.htm
Burr (1879):
Eusebius. Church History. Book 2:
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250102.htm
Larson (1980):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/9.htm
Hyan Maccoby. The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity (1986):
https://archive.org/details/B-001-001-718
Tabor (12/29/15):
https://jamestabor.com/ebionites-nazarenes-tracking-the-original-followers-of-jesus/
https://books.google.com/books?id=uy0YAQAAIAAJ&q=Qumran+Netzer+1QH&dq=Qumran+Netzer+1QH&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi0zdSnrb2PAxX6FlkFHTRPA0YQ6AF6BAgNEAM#Qumran%20Netzer%201QH
-V2:
https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofde0002unse_i4q5/page/606/mode/2up?q=netzer
Waltke (2007) (PP. 563-564 note 8):
Coloe (2014; in Burkett, 2014) (P. 76):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/isaiah/60-21.htm
Mathew 2:23 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/2-23.htm
Acts 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/24.htm
Acts 24:5 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/24-5.htm
Michael Thomas (2011):
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Jesus_100_B_C/reo-mAEACAAJ?hl=en
-Kindle:
https://www.amazon.com/JESUS-100-B-C-Michael-Thomas/dp/1456718444
Luke 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/1.htm
Toledot Yeshu (Meerson and Schafer, 2014 edition). Volume 1:
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Toledot_Yeshu_The_Life_Story_of_Jesus/81hHsItgjqIC?hl=en
Quran (Khattab translation) (Surah 19. Maryam. 19:28):
https://quran.com/19
Nehemiah 11:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/nehemiah/11.htm
Charlesworth et al., (1995) (Vol. 2):
John 12:36 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/12-36.htm
1 Thessalonians 5:5 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/1_thessalonians/5-5.htm
Wacholder (1999) (P. 75 [Snippet only]).
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23508867
Steinmeyer (2025):
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/dead-sea-scrolls/a-dead-sea-scrolls-mystery/
Harkins (2017; in Feldman et al., 2017) (PP. 504 and p. 508):
https://books.google.com/books?id=ENckDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA504&dq=Teacher+of+righteousness+not+historical&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwia1bv-3vyPAxW1GlkFHWBGMNwQ6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=Teacher%20of%20righteousness%20not%20historical&f=false
Harkins (2012; in Mason et al., 2012) (P. 464):
https://biblicalstudies.gospelstudies.org.uk/pdf/dss_pardo.pdf
-V2:
Mitchell (2016):
https://books.google.com/books?id=KpxGDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=David+C.+Mitchell+Messiah+ben+Joseph&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjRi6mvs_-PAxUjEGIAHc4dIMAQ6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=David%20C.%20Mitchell%20Messiah%20ben%20Joseph&f=false
Numbers 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/numbers/13.htm
1 Kings 12:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/1_kings/12.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Ten Lost Tribes of Israel:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ten-Lost-Tribes-of-Israel
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Ephraim:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ephraim-Jewish-tribe
Genesis 41:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/genesis/41.htm
Eisler (1931):
https://archive.org/details/themessiahjesusand/page/n17/mode/1up
Lendering (2001). Livius:
https://www.livius.org/articles/religion/messiah/messianic-claimant-10-the-egyptian-prophet/
Acts 21:38 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/21-38.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Zealot:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zealot
Price (2003) (P. 104):
Brandon (1967):
https://archive.org/details/jesuszealotsstud00bran/mode/2up
Freke and Gandy (2001) (P. 12):
https://books.google.com/books?id=swM_6ufZ2P4C&pg=PA12&dq=therapeutae+jesus&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZyrfAkv-PAxVjEmIAHab9MG0Q6AF6BAgOEAM#v=onepage&q=therapeutae%20jesus&f=false
Theiring (1979):
https://archive.org/details/redatingteachero0000thie/mode/1up
Acts 24:
-24:14 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/24-14.htm
-24:22 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/24-22.htm
Acts 26:10 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/26-10.htm
1 Peter 2:17 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/1_peter/2-17.htm
James 5:19 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/james/5-19.htm
Acts 3:14 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/acts/3-14.htm
2 Corinthians 6:15:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/2_corinthians/6.htm
Mark 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/1.htm
Luke 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/1.htm
1.8. The "Egyptian":
It's time to return to Josephus in order to understand who the "Egyptian" was. In his books The Jewish War and Antiquities of the Jews, Josephus said that Nero became emperor in 54 A.D. (Antiquities of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:1-2). He put three people in charge of certain territories. Aristobulus was put in charge of Armenia, and Agrippa ruled Tiberias and Taricheae of Galilee (Ch. 8:4). Felix was made procurator "over the rest of Judea," (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:2). The Jews became more rebellious by the day, resulting in the rise of robbers (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:5).
Felix crucified many of them, but in their wake sprang the Sicarii. They were known for hiding "daggers under their garments, with which they stabbed those that were their enemies." They committed these actions at festivals, and they hid among the people present there (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:2-3). Sounds like Assassin's Creed! In 55 A.D., a group of people whom Josephus seems to call "impostors" gained many followers (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:6) (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:4). They led their followers into the wilderness, and "would perform manifest wonders and signs, that should be performed by the provenance of God," (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:6). Josephus said that these imposters "deceived and deluded the people under pretence of divine inspiration, but were for procuring innovations and changes of the government." Felix had his hands full capturing them (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:4). Then, the "Egyptian" "came out of Egypt, about this time, to Jerusalem." He said that "he was a prophet" (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:6). He "got together thirty thousand men that were deluded by him: these he led round about from the wilderness to the mount which was called the Mount of Olives," (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:5). He then stated that "at his command, the walls of Jerusalem would fall down," (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:6). He wanted to invade Jerusalem, and take it over by force! Felix led an army out to combat the Egyptian, and a fight broke out. Amongst the chaos, the "Egyptian" and some of his followers escaped. The rest of his army was either killed, or taken captive (The Jewish War, Book 2 Ch. 13:5). Four hundred of the "Egyptian's" followers were killed, and another two hundred of them were taken away. Josephus said that the Egyptian wasn't seen again (Antiquity of the Jews, Book 20 Ch. 8:6).
The "Egyptian" in Antiquity of the Jews (Book 20 Ch. 8:6):
The story of Jesus in the gospels does match the "Egyptian's" for the most part. The most obvious change is Jesus being arrested and killed while his disciples escape. The "Egyptian," and some of his followers, escaped while most of his followers were killed or locked up. Then again, one could say that Jesus' resurrection from the dead at the hands of the Romans is a nod to the fact that the "Egyptian" escaped being captured by them. However, there is another figure that could help raise the idea that Jesus wasn't actually crucified. The man named Barabbas, or Jesus Barabbas, was the man and robber that the Jews wanted released from prison instead of Jesus Christ (Matthew 27:16 [Interlinear]; 27:11-26) (Einhorn, 2013, pp. 3 and 17). It has been noted in the past by some scholars that Jesus Christ and Jesus Barabbas could have been the same person (Einhorn, 2013, pp. 3 and 17).
Links:
Josephus. The Jewish War. Book 2 Ch. 13. University of Chicago:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/war-2.html
Josephus. Antiquity of the Jews. Book 20 Ch. 8. University of Chicago:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-20.html
Matthew 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/13.htm
Matthew 21:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/21.htm
Matthew 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/24.htm
Matthew 26:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/26.htm
Luke 19:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/19.htm
Luke 22:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/22.htm
Mark 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/13.htm
John 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/2.htm
John 8:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/8.htm
John 9:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/9.htm
John 18:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/18.htm
Matthew 27:16 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-16.htm
Matthew 27:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/27.htm
Einhorn (2012):
http://lenaeinhorn.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Jesus-and-the-Egyptian-Prophet-12.11.25.pdf
1.9. Conclusion:
To my surprise, a lot of the "historical references" that I thought supported the existence of the Jesus of the gospels are forgeries or wrongfully equated to him. The gospels, other supposed historical references, and dubious "holy relics" do not definitively prove the existence of Jesus Christ. Using what we know from The Babylonian Talmud, Toledot Yeshu, Celsus, Josephus, and Acts of the Apostles, we can pinpoint a historical person that best matches a historical Jesus: the "Egyptian." The "Egyptian" was an Essene.
2.1. Which God was Jesus Christ?
Jesus also quotes Dionysus in the Acts of the Apostles. In Acts 26:14, the risen Jesus appears to Saul (soon to be called Paul) on the road to Damascus. Jesus says, "It is hard for thee to kick against the pricks" (KJV) (YLT). This phrase came originally from Dionysus: "Better to yield in prayer and sacrifice than to kick against the pricks, since Dionyse is god, and thou but a mortal," (Eurypides, The Bacchae, p. 46). The only conclusion that I can come to is that the Bible is equating Jesus with Dionysus! It doesn't get any better from there! In Acts of the Apostles, Paul says a quote straight out of Aratus of Soli's The Phainomena. Paul said that the "poets" of Athens spoke about his god, in which "'We are all his offspring'" (Acts 17:22 and 28 [NIV] [KJB] [YLT]). Aratus in his poem said about Zeus, "We are his offspring" (The Phainomena, R. Brown translation, p. 13) (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Aratus, para. 2). The NIV translation of Acts 17 even stated that this phrase came straight out of Aratus' poem (Acts 17:28, note c)! Bacchus (Dionysus) was also the sun god, like Jesus (Rev. Taylor, 1833 [1996 edition], p. 43). Dunlap (1858) said that Dionysus, El, Jehova, Baal-Saturn, Bel-Mithra, Sol, Typhon, "the Tyrian Uso(v) (Mars)" who was called Chom in Egypt, and Vulkan-Vulcan-Hephaestus (Baal-Chon), were Malach-Moloch. "Molech was the sun," and "Saturn, Sol, and Mars," are the "Winter, Spring, and Summer Sun" (pp. 109-110). Finally, according to Kavanagh (1871), both Bacchus and Jesus are represented by the fish. The "monogram of the Savior" for Jesus is the same for Bacchus, meaning that Jesus and Bacchus are the Savior. In fact, "the Savior, the cycle, and the fish," are symbols of the sun and are identical for both Jesus and Bacchus. Kavanagh goes on the say that "Bacchus may well be regarded by all true Christians who believe in religious symbols, as a genuine type of the Founder of their holy religion," (p. 279).
The crown of thorns, as well as the purple cloak that the Romans put on Jesus, also seem to have come from Dionysus. According to MacDonald (2017), during the trial of Jesus, a purple cloak called himation, and a crown of thorns, are put on him. This can be seen in the gospels. Dionysus is depicted wearing "a crown of ivy," and a himation, in artwork. Regarding the color purple, MacDonald states that it "was associated with the god of wine." For example, Dionysus wore a purple cloak in the Homeric Hymn to Dionysus (p. 91). It also seems that Jesus being called the "Son of God" in John 19:7 equates him to Dionysus as the son of Zeus in Bacchae 466-467 (p. 93). In summation, the crown of thorns and the purple himation are indicative of the god of wine (p. 115). Freke and Gandy (2001) also stated that Dionysus had a crown of ivy, and wore a purple cloak (Death of the Godman). An alternate explanation for the crown of thorns comes from Shaw (1904). He said that the crown of thorns came from "The sun-god of Autumn," representing "the idea of life and power." It later became known for "suffering and death" (p. 285). According to Brown (1877), the oracle of Apollo Klarios (or Clarius) stated that Adonis-Dionysus is the autumn sun (Vol. 1 pp. 46-47). Acharya S (1999) said that the crown of thorns, also called a "corona [...] or halo," belonged to the sun god (Ch. 11 [p. 8]). This can be seen in a relief of the sun god Helios.
In the relief, Helios is wearing a "disk (nimbus) with rays coming out of it," (University of Cambridge's
Tammuz (1,500 B.C.) (Staatliche Museum zu Berlin) (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Tammuz):
Dumuzi is an interesting deity. His name was spelled as Dumuzi-Abzu (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Dumuzi-Abzu), and Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana).Dumuzi-Abzu was both a goddess, and a god. In Eridu, he was the son of Enki/Ea and the god of the Steppe (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Dumuzi-Abzu). Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana was the Dumuzi of the Steppe, and the "young bridegroom" of Inanna-Ishtar (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana). Dumuzi was also called Tammuz. The spelling of the name Tammuz was based on the "early Sumerian Damu-zid," which later became "Dumu-zid or Dumuzi." Tammuz was the son of Enki, and married to Inanna. He was the god of "new life in nature in the spring," (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Tammuz, para. 1-2, and 4). I'll just call him Dumuzi. Dumuzi is a dying-and-rising god. He even had a dream about his death in the "'Dumuzi's Dream'" text. Although he tried to fight it, his death was inevitable. In the "'Descent of Inanna,'" Tammuz spends "half the year among the living," and the other half in the netherworld. Originally, Inanna was in the netherworld. However, Inanna asks Dumuzi to take her place (para. 6). The main cause of his death was "at the hands of demons from the netherworld." The god was lamented during the celebrations of his death. This happened between spring, or summer (para. 5). Another god Dumuzi was equated to was Damu (para. 9). Coulter and Turner (2000 [2013 edition]) also said that Dumu-zi, Dumuziapsu, Damu, and Tammuz, were Dumuzi. Dumuzi was also the son of Ea, represented by the bull, and was brought down to the underworld and killed by the demons (p. 158).
I must admit that I encountered this god a lot, but didn't think too much of him before. Now, I must add him to the list because he answers another piece of the Jesus puzzle. Dumuzi had three main female supporters: his "devoted sister Gestinanna, his wife Inanna, and his mother Ninsun. The three women are depicted "surrounding" the "dying Dumuzi," (Coulter and Turner, 2000 [2013 edition], p. 158). This reminds me of Jesus' female followers at his death, and resurrection. For example, in Mark, there are three women who see the empty tomb: Mary Magdalene, Salome, and Mary the mother of James. Interestingly, this happened when the sun rose (Mark 16:1-2). During Jesus' crucifixion, there seems to be three or four women present in John: Mary (Jesus' mom), "His mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene." I don't know if Mary's sister is Mary the wife of Clopas, so I'll say that three-four women were there (John 19:25 [NASB]). The BSB version of this passage has four women present, so I'll go with four women (John 19:25 [BSB]). The other gospels have a different count for how many women were present at Jesus' death, and resurrection.
Compared to other dying-and-rising gods, Dumuzi (or as Tammuz) was equated to Adonis (Coulter and Turner, 2000 [2013 edition], p. 158) (Claus, 1972, Vol. 4 p. 46) (Langdon, 1931 [1964 reprint], pp. 51-52) (Bremmer, 2019, p. 293-294) (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Adonis, para. 2) (Hewitt, 1901, p. 29), Melkart (Langdon, 1931 [1964 reprint], pp. 51-52) (Claus, 1972, Vol. 4 p. 46), Marduk (Brown, 1899, Vol. 1 p. 231) (Langdon, 1931 [1964 reprint], pp. 51-52) (Hommel, 1897, p. 68), and Itanos/Tan who later became Zeus (Hewitt, 1901, p. 29). Adonis, in particular, spends half the year with Aphrodite (Ishtar), and the rest of the year in the underworld. Interestingly, Adonis was killed by a boar (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Adonis, para. 1). Elyon was also killed by a boar, and was Adonis (Langdon, 1931 [1964 reprint], p. 66) (L'Heureux, 1979 [2019 edition], p. 44). It should be noted that Melchizedek was a "priest of El Elyon," (Genesis 14:28 [Interlinear]):
Langdon (1931 [1964 reprint]) said that El was Adonis (pp. 66-67). Once again, this helps to explain Jesus Christ as a dying-and-rising god. Itanos'/Tan's mother was "Brito-martis the virgin (martis) cypress tree (berut)." She was also the mother of Adonis (Phoenician), Tammuz (Hebrew), and Dumu-zi (Akkadian) (Hewitt, 1901, p. 29). Adonis was also Dionysus (Brown, 1877, Vol. 1 p. 47). Ausonius, who seems to have been channeling Dionysus (maybe as a prophet), quotes the deity saying that he was Bacchus, Osiris, Phanax, Dionysus, Liber, and Adonis. Blavatsky said that Dionysus was also Adoni (Adonay), and Iah-Jehovah (Ie-Ieue) (Blavatsky, 1891, Vol. 2 p. 302). Dumuzi, Ea/Ieue, El Elyon, Adonis, and Dionysus were all the same god!As for Dumuzi's connection to Ea/Ieue (also called Enlil/'l), the god of the Bible, according to Maranz (2023) (preprint), the "E" in Ea's name is "I3." This represents the number 4. Tammuz (Dumuzi) is d4, and Ea is d40. Together, they make the name "I3.A"/"'I.A." Both Ea and Tammuz were also symbolized by the ram (pp. 22-23; p. 23 note 38). Marduk was also syncretized to Dumuzi in Babylon (p. 33). Brown (1899) also said that Tammuz (Dumuzi) was associated with the ram (Vol. 1 pp. 54 and 198). Dumuzi is Ea! This also means that Elyon-Adonis was Ea/Ieue as well. Since Jesus was the son of Ea/Ieue in Christianity, this equates Jesus to Dumuzi. For more info. on Ieue (YHVH) being Ea, check out my "The Demon Deity Unveiled," and "Who is YHVH?," posts.
Finally, Tammuz (Dumuzi) was weeped for in Jerusalem (Ezekiel 8:14), and worshipped in Bethlehem (Ball, 2016, p. 491). As if there wasn't enough evidence to link Jesus Christ to Dumuzi already...
Gold-plated silver figure of Amun-Ra (The British Museum):
Jesus was also "Jupiter Ammon"/"Jupiter-Ammon," according to Rev. Taylor (1833 [1996 edition]). Rev. Taylor also said that "both Jupiter, Ammon, and God Ammon, and Jesus Christ, Amen, are personifications of the Sun, who is Jupiter, in the Spring; Christ, in Summer; Jesus, in Autumn; and Amen, in Winter," (p. 276). Ammon is Amen, and saying the name of this god at the end of our prayers equates him to Jesus. In fact, Ammon is one of Jesus' names (p. 187). In other words, Jesus is Zeus! Adonis-Dionysus was also the Autumn sun (Brown, 1877, Vol. 1 p. 47). Remember that the Nazorean/Nazarean Essenes called themselves "B'nai Amen (Children of God)." Amen-Ammon is their god. In Revelations 3, Amen is an actual entity. He is "the faithful and true Witness, the Origin of the Creation of God." Amen is talking to John here. He also said that he "sat with My Father on His Throne," (Revelation 3:14 and 21). However, John called Jesus the "faithful witness" (Revelation 1:5). It seems that Amen is the one who appeared to John at the beginning of Revelation. Amen said that he "was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore," (Revelation 1:18). Jesus also sat on the right hand of God, as we've stated before. He also died, and rose from the dead. There can only be one solution here: Amen, or Jupiter-Ammon, IS Jesus Christ!
Another god that we can equate to Jesus is Seth/Set. The "Alexamenos Graffito," which is graffiti, showcases a man worshipping a crucified man on a T-shaped cross. The crucified man is wearing the head of a donkey. It dates to the second-third century A.D. (Yarbrough, 2015; in Yarbrough, 2015, pp. 231-233), or 200 A.D. (University of Chicago, Encyclopaedia Romana: Notae: Gladiators: Graffiti: Alexamenos Graffito). Interestingly, this graffiti is "The earliest representation of the Crucifixion" (University of Chicago, Encyclopaedia Romana: Notae: Gladiators: Graffiti: Alexamenos Graffito).
Alexamenos graffito/Graffiti (Yarbrough, 2015; in Yarbrough, 2015, pp. 232):
Dumuzi and Anum were also equated on the "reverse" side of the tablets O 175/Ra 16 145, and AO 17626 (RA 41 31) (Livingstone, 1986, pp. 187, 194, and 198-199). On the Shorter An = Anum list, Damu, who seems to be similar or identical to Dumuzi, is equated to Anum as "dDamudAnum" (Lambert and Winters, 2023; in George and Krebernik, 2023, pp. 6, 31, 49, 274, and 292). Dumuzi and Anum also seem to have been equated as well (pp. 274 and 292). Damu has been equated to Dumuzi before, as stated previously. Since Dumuzi is Dionysus, then that means Anum was Dionysus too. The cross truly belongs to Dionysus!
According to Gerald Massey, "The Egyptian 'mesu,' to anoint, and as the name for the Anointed, is earlier than the Jewish Messiah. Nor would there have been any typical Christ to anoint but for the making of the Karest-mummy." He says that "The Jesus legend is Egyptian," and that "The Messu, or the Messianic prince of peace, was born into the world at Memphis in the cult of Ptah as the Egyptian Jesus, with the title of Iu-em-hetep, he who comes with peace or plenty and good fortune as the type of an eternal youth," (Massey, 1907 [2008 edition], p. 563).
Ptah was an Egyptian "creator-god and maker of things, a patron of craftsmen, especially sculptors." He was a "mortuary god" as well, "represented as a man in mummy form." As a result, he was "often fused with Seker (or Soker) and Osiris to form Ptah-Seker-Osiris." He was equated to the Greek god Hephaestu-Vulcan (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ptah). Hephaestus-Vulcan was also called Chrysor, and Diamichius-Zeus Michius (Sanchoniatho, Phoenician History [Rev. Cumberland, 1720, translation], pp. 26-27). Osiris was Hades and Dionysus as well (Unwin, 1996, p. 79). Ptah does sound a lot like Jesus, doesn't he? Jesus was the son of a carpenter (Matthew 13:55), and is a dying and rising god. Massey also said that Osiris is the "krast, or embalmed and mummified for the resurrection [...] Thus the Egyptian krast was the pre-Christian Christ, and the pictures in the Roman Catacombs preserve the proof." The "Egyptian karast" is the same as "the Greek Christ, Christos, Krstos, or Latin chrestus, and account for the Corpus Christi, the anointed, the Savior," (Massey, 2005 [2013 edition], Vol. 1, p. 219).
This would be the perfect time to say that Dionysus was equated to the gods Hades, and Osiris. Osiris was a god "who is a symbol of resurrection." In one version of Osiris' death, he was "reincarnated" as the god "Apis." Osiris was "the sun who is overcome by night but who rises again the next morning," (Coulter and turner, 2000 [2021 edition], pp. 152-153, and 367).
The Lord's Prayer also originated from Ptah. "Pater Noster," or "Ptah Noster," means "Our Father," and Ptah means "Father," (Glorian, The Prayer of the Lord). Rev. Vernon-Harcourt (1838) said that "Phtha," written as "Ptah" in Coptic, is "pater" in Latin and is "father" in English (Vol. 1 p. 365). Massey (1907) said that "Ptah-Tanan" was "Dis pater, the Demiurge." He is the "god of Hades," (Vol. 2 p. 636). Churchward (1924 [2000 edition]) said the same thing (p. 349). This makes Ptah the god Zeus-Hades/Pluto. Acharya S (1999) said that Ptah is Dyaus Pitar/Zeus Pateras, and Pitar and Ptah lead to "'pater,' or 'father,'" (p. 179). Mackenzie (1917) said that the "mountain god" became Thor, Tarku-Teshub, Indra, Zeus, and Ptah. Ptah created the potter's wheel, in which he created the sun, moon, and mankind, on. He also had a hammer, which seems to have caused thunderstorms (pp. xxvii-xxviii). Ptah was Zeus.
Ptah means "Father" (Glorian, The Prayer of the Lord, Ptah, para. 4-5):
In summation, Jesus was the sun god. In particular, he was Dionysus. Who turned him into a deity? My answer is the Greeks, and then the Romans. In 2 Maccabees 6, the Greeks were trying to force the Jews to worship Zeus and Dionysus. The Jews refused, and even died in revolt (2 Maccabees 6:1-12). Interestingly, as stated by Thiering (1979), Josephus stated "that Greeks became members of the Essenes," (p. 99):
I hypothesize that, since the Greek's first attempt to make the Jews worship their gods failed miserably, the Greeks turned the leader of the Essenes into one of their deities: Dionysus. I'm thinking that Jesus was a normal man that was turned into a deity after his death. Not to mention, Euripides, the author of The Bacchae, was an ancient Greek dramatist born in Athens in 484 B.C. (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Euripides; para. 1). The Romans worshipped Dionysus under the names Bacchus, and Liber Pater (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Dionysus; para. 6). Since Jesus quotes Dionysus from The Bacchae in Acts, and he has Dionysius' characteristics, this cements in my mind that the Greeks and Romans turned the original Jesus/"Egyptian" into the mythical Jesus Christ. He was turned into the Christian Dionysus.Links:
The Fall of the Rebel Angels by Luca Giordano (Wikipedia, Michael [archangel]):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_%28archangel%29
Archangels and Angels. Archangel Michael-Angelic and Planetary Symbols:
http://www.archangels-and-angels.com/aa_pages/correspondences/angel_planet/archangel_michael.htm
Jewish Encyclopedia. Michael:
https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/10779-michael
Matthew 26:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/26.htm
Luke 22:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/22.htm
Mark 14:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/14.htm
John 8:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/8.htm
John 12:
-NASB:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/12.htm
-NIV:
https://biblehub.com/niv/john/12.htm
Urantia Book:
-Paper 33:3.2 (368.2):
-Paper 120:
https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-120-bestowal-michael-urantia
Cook (1914) (Vol. 1, p. 277):Acts of the Apostles 26:
KJV:
https://biblehub.com/kjv/acts/26.htm
YLT:
https://biblehub.com/ylt/acts/26.htm
Eurypides. The Bacchae:
Aratus of Soli. The Phainomena (R. Brown translation):
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Aratus:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Aratus-Greek-poet
Acts of the Apostles 17:
KJV:
https://biblehub.com/kjv/acts/17.htm
NIV:
https://biblehub.com/niv/acts/17.htm
YLT:
https://biblehub.com/ylt/acts/17.htm
Dunlap (1858) (PP. 109-110):
https://books.google.com/books?id=90ACAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA109&dq=El+was+called+moloch+more+than&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwimh8HOptSEAxU8EGIAHfZUB3kQ6AF6BAgNEAI#v=onepage&q=El%20was%20called%20moloch%20more%20than&f=false
Rev. Taylor (1833 [1996 edition]):
https://books.google.com/books?id=0mYWcpMPtLkC&pg=RA1-PA294&dq=jeue+jew+jupiter&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwigvozEhIaEAxUnEVkFHWTMB844FBDoAXoECAMQAw#v=onepage&q=Jesus&f=false
Yarbrough (2015) (in Yarbrough, 2015):
University of Chicago. Encyclopaedia Romana: Notae: Gladiators: Graffiti: Alexamenos Graffito:
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/gladiators/graffito.html#anchor5371
Blavatsky (1891) (Vol. 2):
The Gospel of the Birth of Mary (Platt, Jr., 1926 translation, p. 17):
https://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/lbob/lbob05.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Seth:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Seth-Egyptian-god
Genesis 4:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/genesis/4.htm
Wake (1888):
Genesis 10:
BSB:
https://biblehub.com/bsb/genesis/10.htm
NIV:
https://biblehub.com/niv/genesis/10.htm
KJB:
https://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/10.htm
Matthew 21:1-11).
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/21.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-War-of-the-Sons-of-Light-Against-the-Sons-of-Darkness
Smith (1876):
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Chaldean_Account_of_Genesis/wqHj8AWy9C0C?hl=en
Gainesville.org. The Maltese Cross:
https://www.gainesville.org/215/The-Maltese-Cross#:~:text=The%20Maltese%20Cross%20is%20known,John
Sovereign Order of Malta. The Eight-Pointed Cross:
https://www.orderofmalta.int/history/the-eight-pointed-cross/
Laughlin (1900; in The Open Court) (Vol. 14, p. 235):
https://books.google.com/books?id=custAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA235&dq=anu+symbol+winged+disk&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifjL-z_sGCAxUlEGIAHWXOBqgQ6AF6BAgIEAM#v=onepage&q=anu%20symbol%20winged%20disk&f=false
Rev. Fradenburgh (1883; in Whedon, 1893) (P. 114):
https://ucatholic.com/blog/constantine-converted-after-seeing-this-vision-in-the-sky-from-god/
Vatican Museums. Museums: Raphael's Rooms: Vision of the Cross:
Hannah (1999) (P. 145):
The Seventh-day Adventist Church Biblical Research Institute. Is Michael another name for Jesus?:
https://www.adventistbiblicalresearch.org/materials/is-michael-another-name-for-jesus/
Massey (1907 [2008 edition]) (P. 563).
https://books.google.com/books?id=z5brNhqPpkcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=christ+egypt&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiyjc3KzauEAxWCKFkFHXfaDtIQ6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=christ%20egypt&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Ptah:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Ptah
Unwin (1996) (P. 79):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/13.htm
Massey (2005 [2013 edition]) (Vol. 1, p. 219):
Sanchoniatho. Phoenician History (Rev. Cumberland, 1720, translation):
https://books.google.com/books?id=g94TAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
-V2:
https://archive.org/details/SanchoniathosPhonicianHistory/page/n47/mode/1up
Glorian. The Prayer of the Lord:
https://glorian.org/learn/courses-and-lectures/defense-for-spiritual-warfare/the-prayer-of-the-lord
Mark 16:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/16.htm
Acts 7:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/7.htm
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dionysus
John 3:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/3.htm
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/20.htm
Rev. Vernon-Harcourt (1838) (Vol. 1 p. 365):
Massey (1907) (Vol. 2 p. 636):
Churchward (1924 [2000 edition]) (P. 349):
Acharya S (1999) (P. 179):
Halsberghe (1972 [2015 edition]) (PP. 120, 159, and 174):
Chacko, 2022, p. 165 note 285):
https://books.google.com/books?id=959vEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA165&dq=january+6th+dionysus&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwicyITGqa2KAxVSElkFHUxbEdE4FBDoAXoECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=january%206th%20dionysus&f=false
John 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/2.htm
Bacchus Richelieu (100/150 A.D.) (Louvre Collections, statue [Bacchus Richelieu]):
-Pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/95Gn7iFAVLdyfWzS6
-Website:
https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010279168
Mithras slaying the bull (The British Museum):
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/G_1825-0613-1
-Pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/UoRJmmRVLMfWLU6c9
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Mithras:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mithra
Shaw (2024) (Ch. 11. Theurgic and Tantric Deification: Dionysus and Shiva [pp. 3-4]):
Brown (1877) (Vol. 1 p. 47):
2 Maccabees 6:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Maccabees%206&version=GNT
Thiering (1979) (P. 99):
https://archive.org/details/redatingteachero0000thie/page/99/mode/1up?q=Levites
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Dumuzi-Abzu:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dumuzi-Abzu
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dumuzi-Amaushumgalana#:~:text=Dumuzi%2DAmaushumgalana%2C%20in%20Mesopotamian%20religion,Lady%20of%20the%20Date%20Clusters.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Tammuz:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tammuz-Mesopotamian-god
-Pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/CgMM1BzFbadGDksm8
Livingstone (1986) (P. 194):
https://archive.org/details/mysticalmytholog0000livi/page/194/mode/1up?q=o+175+Enki
Lambert and Winters (2023; in George and Krebernik, 2023) (PP. 266, 268, 270, 518, and 586):
https://dokumen.pub/an-anum-and-related-lists-god-lists-of-ancient-mesopotamia-orientalische-religionen-in-der-antike-1-9783161613821-9783161613838-3161613821.html
Coulter and Turner (2000 [2013 edition]) (P. 158):
https://books.google.com/books?id=sEIngqiKOugC&pg=PA158&dq=dumuzi+planet%C2%A0&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi_x9bclsmKAxVZEFkFHdikBRsQ6AF6BAgGEAM#v=onepage&q=dumuzi%20planet%C2%A0&f=false
Claus (1972) (Vol. 4 p. 46):
https://archive.org/details/historyofoldtest0004sche/page/46/mode/1up?q=Asherah
-V2 (Snippet):
https://books.google.com/books?id=mRUbkByWSL4C&q=History+of+the+Old+Testament%0D%0Aby+Schedl,+Claus+vol.+4+melkart&dq=History+of+the+Old+Testament%0D%0Aby+Schedl,+Claus+vol.+4+melkart&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiIycWansOJAxVWKlkFHR0-FXYQ6AF6BAgMEAM#melkart%20setting%20sun
Brown (1899) (Vol. 1 p. 231):
https://books.google.com/books?id=WW5AAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA357&dq=poseidon+dagon&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjenv209cOJAxW7M1kFHSjwMnoQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&q=Ea&f=false
Langdon (1931 [1964 reprint]):
https://archive.org/details/MythologyOfAllRacesVolume5/page/n59/mode/2up?q=Yahweh
Hommel (1897) (P. 68):
https://books.google.com/books?id=l6o2AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=professor+hommel+ancient+hebrew+tradition&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj5zszthrGFAxVOFlkFHSQeApgQ6AF6BAgLEAM#v=onepage&q=Ea%20&f=false
Bremmer (2019) (PP. 293-294):
https://books.google.com/books?id=5I_HDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA292&dq=dumuzi+adonis&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiC1Lrm5-KKAxWEMVkFHYsgHv0Q6AF6BAgGEAI#v=onepage&q=dumuzi%20adonis&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Adonis:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Adonis-Greek-mythology
Hewitt (1901) (P. 29):
https://books.google.com/books?id=AV0AAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA29&dq=Tan+Akkadian+god&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihmP6g-MiKAxXPk4kEHXBuMdUQ6AF6BAgGEAM#v=onepage&q=Tan%20Akkadian%20god&f=false
Mark 16:1-2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/mark/16.htm
John 19:25:
-NASB:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/19.htm
-BSB:
https://biblehub.com/bsb/john/19.htm
Blavatsky (1891) (Vol. 2):
Langdon (1931 [1964 reprint]):
https://archive.org/details/MythologyOfAllRacesVolume5/page/n59/mode/2up?q=Yahweh
L'Heureux (1979 [2019 edition]) (P. 44):
https://books.google.com/books?id=9vb7EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA44&dq=Elioun+Adonis&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjhnfSJydKHAxXHD1kFHTpaAH4Q6AF6BAgLEAM#v=onepage&q=Elioun%20Adonis&f=false
The Demon Deity Unveiled:
https://demythifyinggod.blogspot.com/2022/10/was-yhwh-yahwehjehovah-angel.html
Who is YHVH?
https://demythifyinggod.blogspot.com/2025/01/who-is-yhvh.html
Genesis 14:28 (Interlinear):
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/14-18.htm
Mackenzie (1917) (PP. xxvii-xxviii):
Revelation 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/revelation/1.htm
Revelation 3:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/revelation/3.htm
Gold-plated silver figure of Amun-Ra (The British Museum):
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA60006
-Pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/L66rg4mbfVKb4pRr5
Blavatsky (1910) (Vol. 2 p. 452):
Ball (2016) (P. 491):
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/ezekiel/8.htm
MacDonald (2017) (PP. 91, 93, and 115):
Freke and Gandy (2001) (Death of the Godman):
Shaw (1904) (p. 285).
Acharya S (1999) (Ch. 11 [p. 8]):
Brown (1877) (Vol. 1 pp. 46-47);
University of Cambridge's Museum of Classical Archeology Databases. Temple of Athena at Ilion, Helios metope:
https://museum.classics.cam.ac.uk/collections/casts/temple-athena-ilion-helios-metope
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Helios:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Helios-Greek-god
Dunlap (1894 [1898 edition]) (P. 74):
https://books.google.com/books?id=gY1AAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA74&dq=Dionysus+Saturn&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjNsOKomPWNAxVFElkFHbqTITgQ6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q=Dionysus%20Saturn&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Euripides:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Euripides
2.2. The Saul, Paul, Herodian, and Greco-Roman Connections:
St. Paul the Apostle (19th-20th century A.D.) by Friedrich Stummel and Karl Wenzel (Encyclopaedia Britannica. Saint Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament):
I have heard, and read, a lot of things that people have said about St. Paul, originally called Saul of Tarsus. Some say that he was Jesus' "true follower," or even the creator of Christianity. Others say that he "hijacked," or "ruined," Christianity. He was a misogynist, or he was a progressive. So many things have been stated about the man, but I think it's time to investigate the man myself. One thing sticks out to me: Paul seems to have been related to the Herodians, and worked with the Romans! That will be explored below.
According to the New Testament, Saul of Tarsus was originally a Pharisee (Acts 26:4-5) who went to capture the followers of Jesus the Nazarene. This was commanded by his bosses, "the chief priests" (26:9-11). However, while on the road to Damascus, he met the resurrected Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ ordered Saul to go and preach his name amongst the Jews and Gentiles to free them from darkness, sin, and the "power of Satan" (26:12-20). Later on, Saul became Paul (Acts 13:9). That's the typical story of Paul that I'm sure we've all heard of before. However, the more I read about Paul's adventures in the Bible, I keep noticing something weird between him and the Romans...
In Acts 25, Paul was arrested in Jerusalem. He was charged with stirring up trouble amongst the Jews, attempting "to desecrate the temple," and for being "a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes," (Acts 25:1-5). The Romans were going to let Paul go, but the Jews didn't want that. Festus wanted to take Paul to Jerusalem to be tried as "a favor" to the Jews. However, Paul said that he "'ought to be tried'" in Caesarea by Caesar instead. Festus allowed this to happen (Acts 25:2-4, and 9-12) (Acts 28:17-19). In Acts 26:32, it was said by King Agrippa to Festus that Paul "'appealed to Caesar'" for protection. Later on, Paul goes to Rome. Interestingly, he had a "soldier [...] guarding him." He stayed there for two years (Acts 28:16 and 30).
From what I can tell, the Romans seemed to have liked Paul, but why is that? This can be seen in Acts 21. While in Jerusalem, Paul is attacked by a Jewish mob in the temple. Roman soldiers appeared and handcuffed him, but Paul did something interesting. He told the commander of the soldiers, in Greek by the way, that he was a "'Jew from Tarsus in Cilicia, a citizen of no insignificant city.'" He asked the commander to let him speak to the Jewish people, and the commander and the soldiers let him do so (Acts 21:27-40). According to Dr. Eisenman (Eisenman, 1996, para. 1, 8, and 16) (Creating Christ, 37:10-39:35) and Cresswell (2016) (Ch. 9 [p. 3]), these events in Acts supports Paul as having a Roman citizenship. Paul's letters seem to state that Christians are ordered to bow down to the (Roman) "governing authorities" as well. This can be seen in, ironically enough, Romans 13:1-7. Paul also had Greeks in his movement (Acts 21:28) (Eisenman, 1996, para. 6-7). Not only did the Essenes/Ebionites have Greeks in their religious group, but so did Paul. Paul also seems to have had Roman stroke. In fact, Voskuilen (2007) and Voskuilen and Sheldon (2008) said that Paul was a Roman agent!
This leads to Paul's ties to the Herodians. According to Dr. Eisenman (Eisenman, 1996, para. 1-2) (Creating Christ, 41:57-42:31) and Cresswell (2016) (Ch. 9 [p. 3]), Paul wasn't Jewish but Herodian. In Romans 16, Paul has a list of greetings to certain people. One of them is "Herodion, my kinsman" (Romans 16:11). Eisenman said that this was Paul's cousin (Creating Christ, 41:57-42:31). Eisenman (1996) said that Paul survived with the help of the "Herodian/Roman forces" (para. 16). Not only that, but Paul's followers also consisted of Herodians (para. 2 and 8). This fits with a messiah who took pity on sinners, tax collectors, prostitutes, etc. These were part of Herodian "religio-political" occupations (para. 2). Cresswell (2016) said that Herodian/"'little Herod'" and Aristobulus were Herodian relatives of Paul. Aristobulus is mentioned in Romans 16:10. Cresswell later states that Paul having a Roman citizenship links him to the Herodians because the citizenship was a gift to the Herodians by the Romans "for restoring Palestine to Roman rule." Paul also associated himself with "Herodian kings and Roman emperors," (Ch. 9 [p. 3]). Not only was Paul friendly with the Romans, but so were the Herodians. It also seems that Paul was a Herodian!
I found the Bible passage where Paul says he has a Roman citizenship. In Acts 22, after Paul is handcuffed in front of the Jewish temple, the Roman commander has Paul transported "'into the barracks'" to be "'interrogated by flogging.'" Paul tells the centurion, who was in charge to flog him, "'Is it lawful for you to flog a man who is a Roman and uncondemned?'" The centurion goes to the commander, who goes back to Paul and asks Paul if he is a Roman. Pauls's response is "'Yes.'" The commander seems skeptical, saying that his citizenship cost him a lot of money. Paul's retort is "'But I was actually born a citizen.'" The Roman soldiers ended up not laying a finger (or whip) on Paul (Acts 22:22-29). There you have it! Paul was a Roman by birth. Not only that, but our old friends the Ebionites said that Paul wasn't an ethnic Jew! According to Epiphanius, the Ebionites said that Paul "was Greek and of gentile parentage, but that he had later become a proselyte," (The Panarion [Williams, 2009, second edition], Book 1 section 2 para. 25.1 [p. 152]). Oh boy...
If Paul was a Herodian then he was an Edomite/Idumaean, but let's not stop there! Let's investigate the people of Cilicia, where Paul is from. According to Bryce (2009), Cilicia is a "country in southern Anatolia." The original inhabitants of Cilicia seems to have been the Indo-European Luwians in 1,000 B.C. However, the Luwians were in Anatolia since 2,000 B.C. (pp. 166 and 427). Encyclopaedia Britannica said that the Luwians "were related to the Hittites and were the dominant group in the Late Hittite culture," (Luwian, para. 1). As for Cilicia, it was taken over in the 8th century B.C. by the Assyrians. In the 6th-4th century B.C., Cilicia was "semiautonomous" under the Persian empire. In the 4th century B.C., the Macedonian and Seleucid Greeks took over. The Romans later conquered Cilicia in the 1st century B.C. (Cilicia, para. 2). There's a lot of historical support here for a Gentile Paul after all. In fact, Maccoby (1986) stated that the Ebionites'/Nazarene's comments on Paul "could claim the possession of authoritative traditions." They claimed that "Saul was not a Pharisee and not even a Jew by birth," (p. 60). Sources from "the Church fathers Justin Martyr (second century), Irenaeus, Hippolytus and Tertullian (end of the second century and the first half of the third), Origen (middle of the third century), and Epiphanius and Jerome (fourth century) [...] confirm that the Ebionites opposed Paul as a false prophet," (p. 180). Maccoby also stated that Epiphanius quoted the Ebionites of accusing Paul of being a proselyte to the Jewish faith in order "to marry the daughter of the priest." When the daughter rejected Paul, Paul went on to attack Judaism. Maccoby said that most of this is not historical, but the historical aspects seem to be that Paul "was a 'Greek' (i.e. a Hellenistic Greek), and that he was involved with the High Priest (here simply called 'the priest')." Paul probably defected from the Jewish priesthood and joined "the Jesus movement" when he failed "to achieve an ambition." Paul's true love, according to Maccoby, was Judaism. This led him to create "Pauline Christianity" (pp. 182-183). I stated this before, but I want to reiterate it again. Maccoby said that the Jesus in the Gospel of John is completely different from the Jesus in the other three gospels. The Jesus in John "spouts grandiose Hellenistic mysticism and proclaims himself a divine personage," (pp. 43-44). According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, Hellenism was the "the spread of Greek (Hellenic) culture" by intermingling it with "other populations." This also included "the fusion of Greek and Eastern elements" (Hellenistic age, para. 1). Saul/Paul of Tarsus was a Gentile, and he believed in Hellenism. The Ebionites didn't like him, and accused him of spreading false information.
By the way, who were the Herodians? From what I can tell, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica, Herod or Herod the Great and Herodes Magnus was the son of an Edomite/Idumaean father named Antipater and an Arabian Nabataean woman. Some researchers believe that the Edomites/Idumaeans were Arabian as well. The Edomites/Idumaeans "converted to Judaism in the 2nd century BCE." Thus, Herod the Great was an Arabian Edomite/Idumaean practicing Jew. In 63 B.C., Pompeii invaded Palestine. He and Antipater began a working relationship, which is how the Herods became associated with the Romans. Julius Caesar made Antipater the "procurator of Judea in in 47 BCE, and conferred on him Roman citiizenship." This was also given "to Herod and his children." Herod later became the governor, and then tetrarch, of Galilee. In 40 B.C., the Parthians invaded Palestine and caused a "civil war." Herod had to "flee to Rome." In 37 B.C., the Romans put Herod in charge of Judea as its king. He married the "Hasmonean princess" named "Mariamne." The Hasmoneans were a "priestly family of Jewish leaders" who initially didn't like Herod. His marriage to Mariamne seemed to have settled that (Herod, para. 1; Family and early life; King of Palestine, para. 1). Herod is also mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew. In it, he tries to kill the infant Jesus Christ in order to, seemingly, protect his throne. He even tried to use the magi to get Jesus' location. When the magi are warned in a dream by God that Herod was trying to kill Jesus, they left. In retaliation, Herod killed the baby boys of Bethlehem. However, the Holy Family had already left (Matthew 2). Herod isn't the only Herodian mentioned in the gospels. In fact, one of them was one of Jesus' female followers! Her name is Joanna, who was Herod’s steward and the wife of Chuza (Luke 8:3). Interesting...
Paul was biologically related to the Herodians, and the Herodians were friendly with the Romans. Could the Romans and Herodians conspired together to help create the Jesus Christ of the gospels? Well, Gassner (2019) said that Herod got rid of the priests hired by the Hasmoneans and inserted his own "priests from Jewish families that came from the diaspora." This "ruling religious class [...] was loyal to the king and was more open-minded than its predecessor." Gassner said that Herod was "seeking a more sympathetic religious order" because the Pharisees and Sadducees "were unhappy with the king in some way," (A Complex Relationship with Judaism, para. 1-2). According to Davis (2018), the Romans were scared of the rampant growth of Judaism and feared that it "would become the main religion of the empire." It was a threat to Rome's view on slavery, "which is how the Roman aristocracy fed, lived, and ruled." Eventually, the Jewish zealots rose up to challenge the Herodians. The Pharisees also became too influential, beating the Hasmoneans/Maccabeans in popularity, so their power was removed from them by their Roman overlords. Judaism also seemed to have been popular during the Roman empire, which was also detrimental to the Romans. Later on, Jewish zealots rose up against the Herodians. Davis suggests that, since the Jewish books fed the zealots' fire to riot against the Romans, the Romans needed to manufacture "a new 'Jewish book' [...] to control the beliefs of the Jewish people," (Ch. 5 [pp. 1-4]). Voskuilen (2007) said that Paul's Jesus was "meant to divide the Jewish resistance organization and pacify it," (Abstract). Hm... Eisenman (1998) said that the zealots were connected to the Ebionites, Essenes, and Qumran. These groups came after "James' Jerusalem Church or Jerusalem Community," and "can be thought of as opposed to the reining Herodian Establishment and looked on as the various constituents of the Opposing Alliance." This alliance was the "Pharisee Roman/Herodian Establishment," (Ch. 3. Romans, Herodians, and Jewish Sects: Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots [p. 6]). Jesus' followers opposed the Pharisees, Herodians, and the Romans. As a result, the Romans had to have known about Jesus and his activities (Brandon, 1967, p. 330).
Did you know that Paul had his own gospel!? According to Mount (2022), Marcion stated that "Paul preached the true gospel" while "All the other apostles corrupted" it. Marcion favored Paul's teachings, and "elevated Paul at the expense of the other apostles and replaced the Jewish scriptures." He also stated that the Jewish "creator god," and the Christian god, were different deities. As a result, Marcion created the first Christian canon consisting of "one Gospel" that seems to be similar to Luke and Acts, "and a collection of ten Pauline letters." Interestingly, the Church Father Irenaeus made his own canon based on Marcion's in order to retract Marcion's canon (in Moessner et al., 2022, pp. 97-98). According to the Early Christian Writings website, this gospel was called The Gospel of the Lord (Marcion, Text). In this gospel, there is no report of John the Baptist's birth, the Annunciation, virgin birth, a 12-year old Jesus staying at the Jerusalem temple, or an adult Jesus being baptized by John the Baptist. It starts with an adult Jesus going to Capernaum (Gospel of the Lord [at the Gnostic Society Library], Section 1) (Gospel of Marcion, Section 1: The Arrival of Jesus at Capernaum). Jesus either just "came down to Capernaum" (Gospel of the Lord [at the Gnostic Society Library], Section 1), or "Jesus descended [out of heaven] into Capernaum," (Gospel of Marcion, Section 1: The Arrival of Jesus at Capernaum). A Roman centurion asks Jesus to heal his sick servant, and Jesus said that he had the best faith out of anyone in Israel (Section 1: Faith of the Centurion). It also mentions "Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod's steward" too (Gospel of Marcion, Section 2: Women Ministers). Near the end of the gospel, when Jesus is arrested, Pilate sends him to Herod since Jesus was Galilean. Galilee was "Herod's jurisdiction." Herod wanted to see a sign from Jesus, but Jesus just remained silent. Herod, and his soldiers, mocked Jesus and put "a gorgeous robe" on him. This, interestingly, ends the bad blood between Herod and Pilate (Section 6: Jesus Before Pilate and Herod, para. 3). This is also in Luke 23:8-12. I should mention that this Herod was Herod Antipas, the "son of Herod the Great and Malthace, a Samaritan woman." He is also the one who had John the Baptist beheaded (Bible Hub, Strong's Hebrew. 2264. Herodes, Thayer's Greek Lexicon, number 2). Going back to the gospel, Pilate tried to free Jesus from captivity but the Jews wanted him crucified (Section 6: Jesus Crucified). After Jesus died, the Roman centurion present there said that Jesus "was righteous" (Section 6: Jesus Crucified, para. 5). Finally, Joanna, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, went to Jesus' tomb and found it empty. They ran back to tell the disciples about it (Section 6: Jesus Crucified, para. 6; The Empty Tomb, para. 1-3). The Herodians, and Romans, were written in a positive light in Paul's gospel. They were followers of Jesus, or converted to believing in him. They even tried to help him. This was necessary because Jesus' true followers hated the Herodians and the Romans, and were causing for the ruling classes. The narrative had to change. The Herodians and Romans were "good guys who loved Jesus," and not his enemies. This was historical revisionism.
In his Gnostic and Historic Christianity (1887) lecture, Gerald Massey explained that the Church Father Tertullian stated that the Jesus in the Gospel of the Lord "was a phantom, who appeared suddenly at the synagogue of Capernaum in the likeness of a full-grown man for the purpose of protesting against the law and the prophets," (para. 47). Massey then stated that the Jesus of Marcion, Paul, and the Gnostics, was "mythical and not historical" and "has no Jewish father or mother." In fact, the Jesus of the Gospel of the Lord has a "Gnostic nature," and was "Gnostic" period. Finally, Massey said that the Christian Fathers Irenaeus and Tertullian claimed that Marcion edited Luke, but it seems that the Christians changed the Gospel of the Lord into the Gospel of Luke. The Gnostics didn't change anything (para. 47-48). Was Paul a Gnostic!?
It has been assumed by scholars, according to Matthews (2018), based on the testimonies of the Church Fathers/"heresiologists", that Marcion took the Gospel of Luke, redacted some stuff out of it in order to support "his heretical teaching," and spread it out as his own gospel called the "Evangelion" (Matthews, 2018; in Muller and Omerzu, 2018, pp. 253-254). Klinghardt (2008) also stated that Marcion's gospel has been assumed to have been "a redaction of Luke," (Abstract). However, both sources state that Marcion's gospel proceeds the canonical Luke. Klinghardt said that Marcion's (which is actually Paul's) "gospel is not a redaction of Luke, but rather proceeds Matthew and Luke," (Abstract). Matthews (2018) said that, along with other scholars, Marcion editing Luke doesn't make sense. In fact, Marcion would've been "a very incompetent redactor" because some passages in the gospel go against Marcion's belief. Either Luke is an expansion of Marcion's (Paul's) gospel, or both Marcion's and Luke's gospels came from a previous version of said gospel. There also seems to be the matter of the gospel being edited to fight Marcion's belief. One good example is Luke 1 and 2, which seem to emphasize a divine Jesus who became a human and was circumcised, and that he was "a savior" whose god was a "militant, battle-ready" deity (in Muller and Omerzu, 2018, pp. 254-256). An earlier scholar named Charles Waitte said that "Marcion's Gospel was probably first written," (Waitte, 1906, p. 20). He seems to be referring to Mark, Matthew, and Luke, and is using John the Baptist as an example (check pp. 18-19). He stated earlier that Paul's gospel, which he called "the Gospel of Paul," was the foundation for Luke's gospel (pp. 4-6). Paul's gospel was earlier than Luke's, and it later became the Gospel of Luke. It seems that the Church Fathers did this.
I want to point out that the Gospel of Matthew portrays the Herodians as villains. As noted previously, Herod the Great tried to kill the infant Jesus. This isn't in The Gospel of the Lord, nor in Luke. This is because The Gospel of Matthew was the Ebionite and Nazarene (Nazoraion) gospel originally. According to Nicholson (1879), this gospel was The Gospel according to the Hebrews (pp. 9-10). It had no genealogy of Jesus, Annunciation, virgin birth, Magi, or Herod the Great attempting to kill Jesus or killing the baby boys. The Ebionite prologue starts with an adult Jesus going to "Capharnaum" (Capernaum) (pp. 9-10, and 28-29). The Nazarene into has Jesus coming out of Egypt
(pp. 30-31). Since the Ebionites and Nazoraion were the original followers of Jesus, it seems that a lot of events in the gospels today were added in at a later date. The Ebionites/Nazorain had their gospel first, and it's possible that Saul/Paul added his own spin to it. Both the Ebionite and Saul's gospels started with Jesus going to Capernaum, so that could be a hint. This could explain why the Ebionites called Paul a false prophet.
If we take in all of this information together, a picture starts to emerge: The Herodian family was friendly with the Romans. Herod the Great was put in charge of Judea. Herod married into the Hasmoneans, got rid of their previous priestly group, and superseded it with his own. The Pharisees, and seemingly the Sadducees, lost their power. The Jewish zealots rose up in protest against the Herodians, and then we see Saul/Paul of Tarsus spreading the message of a new religion that preached pro-Roman/Herodian beliefs. The Ebionites condemned Paul's teachings, and called him "a Greek" (Hellenist) who was a Gentile. Paul was a Herodian, a Roman citizen, and was protected by the Romans. I'm starting to see why Christians are so split on Paul. Paul was working for, and was biologically related to, the bad guys! Paul being a Hellenist can help explain why Paul's Christianity was so popular in Rome, and today. The Jesus Christ of the modern-day gospels is a Hellenistic creation (a mortal Jewish man combined with a Greco-Roman deity). Later on, the Church Fathers edited Paul's gospel to be the Gospel of Luke. I also suspect that they took the Ebionite gospel, and edited it to make it the Gospel of Matthew. In Matthew, Herod was probably turned into a bad guy in order to align with what the Jews thought of him. Some support for this comes from Eisenman (1996), who said that the people in Qumran were "anti-Herodian" (para. 3). That anti-Herodian belief seems to have been added to the Gospel of Matthew.
Paul inserting himself into the Ebionites seems to have splintered the group. According to Fitzmyer (1971 [1997 edition]), the Church Fathers Origen and Eusebius said that there were "two kinds of Ebionites." He then states that Epiphanius named the groups as "Nazoraioi" and "Ebionaioi." The Nazoraioi were "orthodox," and "probably admits the virgin birth of Christ." The Ebionaioi were "heterodox" (pp. 443-444). Epiphanius said that a man named Ebion created the Ebionites. He was a Nazoraean who left to start his own movement (The Panarion [Williams, 2009, second edition], Book 1 section 2 number 30 para. 1.1 [p. 131]). As we already know, the Ebionites were the Essenes and from Qumran. They knew Jesus. Epiphanius is wrong about a man named Ebion starting the group. In the New Testament, Paul was called "a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes," (Acts 24:1-5). As stated above, the Nazoraion was one of the names for the people of Qumran. Perhaps they were the ones that welcomed Paul, and became the "orthodox group of Ebionites" mentioned by Origen, Eusebius, and Epiphanius? I believe that this is where "Pauline Christianity" (Bible Hub, What are Pauline Christianity's beliefs?) began. The Ebionites kept to the original teachings of Jesus, while the Nazoraion became followers of Paul. This could also be the reason why Jesus was called "'a Nazarene'" only (and not an Ebionite), and grew up in Nazareth, in the gospels (Matthew 2:22-23) (Luke 2:4 and 39). This also solidifies my idea that Paul took the Ebionite/Nazoraion gospel, the Gospel according to the Hebrews, and turned it into his Gospel of the Lord.
Just when I thought that this investigation into Saul/Paul couldn't get any more complicated, it seems that Saul and Paul were actually two different personages. According to Eisenman (1998), "Josephus identifies a 'Saul or 'Saulus'" who was a "Herodian ('a relative of Agrippa')" and had a relative named "Antipas." He also had a brother named "Costobarus." These figures were identified in Josephus' book Antiquities of the Jews (Ch. 13. James as Opposition High Priest and Oblias). Cresswell (2016) also believes that the Saul/Saulus mentioned by Josephus could be the Saul of the New Testament (Preface [p. 5]; Ch. 9 [p. 3]). This Saul was "the Herodian Saul, who persecuted the weak and plundered their property and then sided with the Romans in the Jewish uprising from CE 66-70," (Preface [p. 5]). Cresswell also stated that Saul's converts "brought with them their existing pagan beliefs" into Saul's Christianity. In particular, Cresswell mentions "Mithras and Dionysus." (Ch. 9 [p. 4]). We already know that Mithras and Dionysus were incorporated into the creation of the Jesus Christ of the gospels. Unlike the forged Christianized passages about Jesus Christ, Josephus' passages on Saul the Herodian seem legit. We have extra-biblical evidence that Saul was a historical person, and a Herodian that worked with the Romans.
Meanwhile, Paul might actually have been the "Egyptian!" In Acts 21, when Paul was arrested at the Jewish Temple when he came to Jerusalem, the Roman commander was surprised to learn that Paul spoke Greek. He then exclaimed that Paul was "'not the Egyptian who some time ago stirred up a revolt and led the four thousand men of the Assassins out into the wilderness?'" Paul then retorts, "'I am a Jew of Tarsus in Cilicia, a citizen of no insignificant city,'" (Acts 21:27-40). I first heard of this from a YouTube video by Reconstructed Bible. Author Ahmen Osman said that some people believed that the "Egyptian" was Jesus ben Stada, but he doesn't agree. He believes that Josephus' account of the "Egyptian" fits with Paul's arrest in Acts 21:37-38. Osman later states that Josephus said that the "Roman procurator" Felix, of 52-60 A.D., battled the "Egyptian" and his followers. The "Egyptian" evaded being captured by Felix, and disappeared (Osman, 2004, Ch. 6. Another Time, Another Place). Paul met "governor" Felix in Acts 24. How interesting... If this Felix was the same Felix that fought the "Egyptian" and his followers, Paul was a leader of the Nazoraion, and the "Egyptian" is Jesus, then it is probable that Paul was Jesus/"Egyptian" while Saul is the Saint Paul of the New Testament! It's crazy to think that Jesus and Paul were the same person. However, Einhorn made a similar conclusion (Gray, 2016, Ch. 5 note 3) (History Valley, Jesus the Egyptian - A Shift in Time with Lena Einhorn [YouTube]). I'm going to keep Saul and Paul as two different figures for now.
Why would Saul create his own gospel? I think the reason is due to the Jews' hostile attitude towards the Herodians (his own people), and the Romans. The Jews who were rebelling were members of Jesus'/Teacher of Righteousness' own community. I believed he infiltrated their ranks, converted some of the members, and helped to spread his own beliefs that were more positive towards the Herodians and Romans. How did he achieve this? Well, the Essenes believed that Jesus/Teacher would come back at the Last Judgement, as stated previously. Why not say that he has already come back... in a vision (Galatians 1:11-17) (Acts; 26:4-20)? That's what Saul did, and it spread like wildfire. Saul used Jesus/Teacher as a tool to spread his own religion: Orthodox Christianity.
Why did the Church Fathers edit the Gospel according to the Hebrews and the Gospel of the Lord? I think the answer lies at the First Council of Nicaea of 325 A.D. I've heard of this event back in private school, but more predominantly after I started my investigation back in 2019. According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, the belief in Arianism, "that Christ is not divine but a created being," and "the controversy over the relationship between the persons of the Trinity," were the catalysts for the creation of the Council (First Council of Nicaea, para. 1; Arianism, para. 2). The main point of the Council seems to have been "To further define orthodoxy." Arius of Alexandria, the creator of Arianism, was "exiled" by "Constantine" after he "refused to sign the formula of faith stating that Christ was of the same divine nature as God." After that, "a creed" was made "to signify the absolute equality of the Son with the Father," (para. 1; Arianism). What does this have to do with the two gospels? It demonstrates that the controversy over who Jesus Christ was persisted for a couple hundred years after the real Jesus/Teacher of Righteousness died. I believe that the Ebionite, and Saul's, gospels started this. Arianism added more fuel to the fire. At the First Council of Nicaea, Jesus being divine was made orthodox.
I also believe that other story elements were added to the gospels later on as well, including Jesus being a descendant of David. Perhaps this was done to draw in more Orthodox Jewish converts?
I truly believe now that Saul, and the Greco-Roman culture, created the supernatural Jesus Christ of the gospels. He was finalized as a god at the First Council of Nicaea. According to the Ebionites, it seems that Saul tried to sneak into the their community but they didn't want anything to do with him. They knew that he was making false statements about their leader. That didn't stop Saul from converting the Nazoraion, or some of them at least. It's all coming together now! As to why this happened, it seemed that the Herodians wanted their own version of Judaism in which they could control. They also needed their own version of Judaism to combat the rebellious followers of Jesus. The Herodian/Greco-Roman version of Judaism, soon to be called Christianity, was started by Saul and his Nazoraion group. It was more open to Gentiles/Goyim (non-Jews) like the Greeks and Romans. All of this can be seen in Saul's Gospel of the Lord, which is probably a modified version fo the Ebionite/Nazoraion Gospel according to the Hebrews.
Additionally, I would like to make an edit as to who I think the identity of the Wicked Priest was. I stated previously that I thought it was Judas Iscariot, but now I believe that it was Saul. This decision stems from the statements made by the Ebionites.
Links:
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Saint Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament:
https://www.britannica.com/list/st-pauls-contributions-to-the-new-testament
-Pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/yqTyWMGvVm3mogG88
Khan Academy. Brown (n.d.). READ: Greco-Roman:
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/big-history-project/agriculture-civilization/first-cities-states/a/greco-roman
Acts 21:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/21.htm
Acts 26:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/26.htm
Acts 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/13.htm
Acts 25:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/25.htm
Acts 28:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/28.htm
Eisenman (1996):
https://depts.drew.edu/jhc/eisenman.html
Creating Christ (YouTube):
https://youtu.be/gHOK66qj9xc?si=gIMpwpv-tpHv6sPy
Cresswell (2016):
https://books.google.com/books?id=zqPACwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Peter+Cresswell%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifqoD2qf2OAxUlGVkFHfmyO2kQ6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q&f=false
Romans 13:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/romans/13.htm
Romans 16:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/romans/16.htm
Acts 22:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/22.htm
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Herod:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Herod-king-of-Judaea#:~:text=Herod%20(born%2073%20bce%E2%80%94died,intrigues%20in%20his%20later%20years.
Matthew 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/2.htm
Luke 8:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/8.htm
Epiphanius. The Panarion (Williams, 2009, second edition) (Book 1 section 2 para. 25.1 [p. 152]):
https://books.google.com/books?id=IKyxt9kyys8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Panarion+of+Epiphanius+of+Salamis+iesous&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCuqGq7c-EAxX-FFkFHelmDAAQ6AF6BAgLEAI#v=snippet&q=Ebionites%20Paul&f=false
Bryce (2009) (PP. 166 and 427):
https://books.google.com/books?id=E1aF0hq1GR8C&pg=PA429&dq=The+Routledge+Handbook+of+the+Peoples+and+Places+of+Ancient+Western+Asia:+From+the+Early+Bronze+Age+to+the+Fall+of+the+Persian+Empire+luwians&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj81_KMp4OPAxV-EFkFHXpkA6kQ6AF6BAgLEAM#v=onepage&q=The%20Routledge%20Handbook%20of%20the%20Peoples%20and%20Places%20of%20Ancient%20Western%20Asia%3A%20From%20the%20Early%20Bronze%20Age%20to%20the%20Fall%20of%20the%20Persian%20Empire%20luwians&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Luwian:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Luwian#:~:text=Luwian%2C%20member%20of%20an%20extinct,(See%20Luwian%20language.)
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Cilicia:
https://www.britannica.com/place/Cilicia
Hyan Maccoby. The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity (1986):
https://archive.org/details/B-001-001-718
Gassner (2019):
https://www.thetorah.com/article/how-jewish-was-herod
Davis (2018):
https://books.google.com/books?id=-M1VEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Did+the+Romans+invent+Christianity&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj31tHL-sGGAxUjpIkEHeqjAisQ6AF6BAgFEAM#v=onepage&q&f=fa
Voskuilen (2007):
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09592310500079940
-V2:
https://www.scribd.com/document/347850907/Documents-mx-Operation-Messiah-Did-Christianity-Start-as-a-Roman-Psychological-Counterinsurgency
Voskuilen and Sheldon (2008):
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Operation_Messiah/0l0RAQAAIAAJ?hl=en
-V2:
https://ebin.pub/operation-messiah-st-paul-roman-intelligence-and-the-birth-of-christianity-0853037027-9780853037026.html
Mount (2022) (in Moessner et al., 2022) (PP. 97-98):
https://books.google.com/books?id=I_qCcuRR30oC&pg=PA98&dq=gospel+of+the+lord+paul+marcion&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiD14bIho2PAxWHFlkFHf3GIsUQ6AF6BAgFEAM#v=onepage&q=gospel%20of%20the%20lord%20paul%20marcion&f=false
Early Christian Writings. Marcion:
https://www.earlychristianwritings.com/marcion.html
Bible Hub. Strong's Hebrew. 2264. Herodes:
https://biblehub.com/greek/2264.htm
Nicholson (1879):
https://archive.org/details/thegospelaccordi00nichuoft/page/n48/mode/1up
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Hellenistic age:
https://www.britannica.com/event/Hellenistic-Age
Matthews (2018; in Muller and Omerzu, 2018) (PP. 253-254):
https://books.google.com/
Klinghardt (2008) (Abstract):
https://www.jstor.org/stable/
Waitte (1906):
https://books.google.com/books?id=WSW4Sv2JheIC&printsec=frontcover&dq=History+of+Christianity+to+the+year+200&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiR4sqyme6IAxXbF1kFHe1vBCsQ6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q&f=false
-V2 (Date):
https://books.google.com/books?id=D3tbAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=History+of+the+Christian+Religion+to+the+Year+200&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiAiN-BlZCPAxXcFlkFHYWQCmMQ6AF6BAgGEAM#v=onepage&q=History%20of%20the%20Christian%20Religion%20to%20the%20Year%20200&f=false
Encyclopaedia Britannica. First Council of Nicaea:
https://www.britannica.com/event/First-Council-of-Nicaea-325
Gerald Massey. Gnostic and Historic Christianity. 1887:
https://tringlocalhistory.org.uk/massey/dpr_04_gnostic_and_historic.htm
-V2 (Date):
https://books.google.com/books?id=yYW0RBXZSVMC&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Fitzmyer (1971 [1997 edition]) (PP. 443-444):
https://books.google.com/books?id=ElJQNk_r9AEC&pg=PA435&dq=Ebionites+qumran&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwii8pjloaePAxWLK1kFHdFaFQoQ6AF6BAgFEAM#v=onepage&q=Ebionites%20qumran&f=false
Acts 24:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/acts/24.htm
Bible Hub. What are Pauline Christianity's beliefs?
https://biblehub.com/q/what_are_pauline_christianity's_beliefs.htm
Eisenman (1998) (Ch. 3. Romans, Herodians, and Jewish Sects: Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots [p. 6]):
https://books.google.com/books?id=XhJcW8h2BlMC&pg=PT72&dq=ebionites+zealots&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCtLuklKqPAxUJGVkFHXD_CUwQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&q=ebionites%20zealots&f=false
Matthew 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/2.htm
Luke 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/luke/2.htm
Reconstructed Bible. Was the Apostle Paul the Mysterious Revolutionary Known as "The Egyptian"? YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdjJjW7pYZU&list=LL&index=1
Osman (2004):
https://books.google.com/books?id=9VkoDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Was+Jesus+an+Egyptian+Pharaoh&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwii_aH67NePAxXcF1kFHRvPF-QQ6AF6BAgOEAM#v=onepage&q=Was%20Jesus%20an%20Egyptian%20Pharaoh&f=false
Galatians 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/galatians/1.htm
Gray (2016) (Ch. 5 note 3):
https://books.google.com/books?id=BQ4_CgAAQBAJ&pg=PT165&dq=Are+Paul+and+Jesus+the+same+person?&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiCs578yO2PAxVzF1kFHbjDAeYQ6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=Are%20Paul%20and%20Jesus%20the%20same%20person%3F&f=false
History Valley. Jesus the Egyptian - A Shift in Time with Lena Einhorn. YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/live/dROaTxbHNYY?si=xeoW_gZzRD4djzFD
Brandon (1967):
https://archive.org/details/jesuszealotsstud00bran/mode/2up
Part 3: Was Jesus the Jewish Messiah?
3.1. The Origin of the Word "Christ"-"Messiah":
Finding out the history of the word "Christ"/"Messiah" helps to shed some light on how Jesus being the Christ/Messiah in Christianity doesn't mix well with the Jewish Christ/Messiah. According to Gerald Massey, "The Egyptian 'mesu,' to anoint, and as the name for the Anointed, is earlier than the Jewish Messiah. Nor would there have been any typical Christ to anoint but for the making of the Karest-mummy." He says that "The Jesus legend is Egyptian," and that "The Messu, or the Messianic prince of peace, was born into the world at Memphis in the cult of Ptah as the Egyptian Jesus, with the title of Iu-em-hetep, he who comes with peace or plenty and good fortune as the type of an eternal youth," (Massey, 1907 [2008 edition], p. 563).
Massey also said that Osiris is the "krast, or embalmed and mummified for the resurrection [...] Thus the Egyptian krast was the pre-Christian Christ, and the pictures in the Roman Catacombs preserve the proof." The "Egyptian karast" is the same as "the Greek Christ, Christos, Krstos, or Latin chrestus, and account for the Corpus Christi, the anointed, the Savior," (Massey, 2005 [2013 edition], Vol. 1, p. 219).
According to Graves and Graves (1879), the Chaldean word "Chris" is a "term for the sun." The word Christ is derived from Chris. The authors also said that the name Jesus meant "'the one great fire of the sun'." (p. 191). A scholar named Bochart said this as well, concerning the Chaldean word Chris ("hrs") (Kavanagh, 1871, p. 390).
In summation, the word Christ-Messiah is Egyptian and Chaldean in origin, and the Egyptian form is older than the Jewish form. The Egyptian Messiah was an anointed peaceful god who was then mummified for a resurrection. Jesus ben Pandeira went to Egypt, and learned "sorcery" there. Is it possible that Jesus learned about the Egyptian Christ-Messiah, and saw himself as that instead?
Links:
Massey (1907 [2008 edition]) (P. 563).
Massey (2005 [2013 edition]) (Vol. 1, p. 219):
Graves and Graves (1879) (P. 191):
Kavanagh (1871) (P. 390):
Maranz (2023 [Preprint]):
Zenodohttps://zenodo.orgPDFAkkadian Vocabulary of Noah's Ark – N. Maranz
-V2:
https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/6642adcb418a5379b02ebadc
Brown (1899) (Vol. 1 pp. 54 and 198):
https://books.google.com/books?id=ouF5_WqiploC&pg=PA54&dq=ram+of+athamas+tammuz&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0v4HDjs-NAxW6D1kFHbVsDNcQ6AF6BAgLEAM#v=onepage&q=ram%20of%20athamas%20tammuz&f=false
3.2. Was Jesus the Jewish Messiah or Not?
Larson (1980) said that the Jewish Messiah was different from the Essene Messiah. Interestingly, the Essene Messiah seems to have shared similarities with Zoroastrianism. The Orthodox Jewish Messiah "was not a moral judge; there was no Last Judgement; and his projected kingdom was not one of saints or righteousness." This kingdom was suppose to be an earthly one. The Essene Messiah borrowed the Jewish concept, and modified it. This includes Zoroastrian influences (pp. 13-14). The Orthodox Jewish Messiah is different from the Essene Messiah.
Melachim uMilchamot. Ch. 11 Section 4:
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188356/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-11.htm
Jewish Virtual Library, Moses Maimonides (Rambam):
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Maimonides.html
Ohr Somayach. Ask the Rabbi: Why Jews Don't Believe in Jesus:
https://ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/2637/Q1/
Rabbi Simmons (n.d.) (Retrieved on 4/2/23):
https://aish.com/why-jews-dont-believe-in-jesus/
Norman (2007):
Ciss (n.d.) (Retrieved on 4/2/23):
https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/videos/six-reasons-why-jews-don-t-believe-in-jesus
John 7:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/7.htm
John 1:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/1.htm
John 9:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/john/9.htm
Malachi 4:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/malachi/4.htm
Larson (1980) (PP. 13-14):
3.3. Why did Jesus have to Die?
There was always a question as to why Jesus had to die. I found an answer in studying the god of Christianity. Check out my "The Demon Deity Unveiled" post. The god of Judaism, Christianity, and Muslims, demands human sacrifice. However, a second answer can be found in Vermes (1962 [1995 edition]). In the Rules for the Qumran/Essene community, two goats were offered up to YHWH (Ieue) and Azazel. The goat offered to Ieue symbolized the "iniquities," "guilt," and "sins," of the "children of Israel." Ieue's goat was sacrificed, and burned. This was done on the Day of Atonement, which is the tenth day of the seventh month (pp. 159-160). Jesus said that his blood will be "poured out for many for forgiveness of sins." Jesus' spilled blood is the "blood of the covenant," (Matthew 26:26-28). There are other New Testament passages that said that Jesus was a human sacrifice to Ieue (Hebrews 9:11-15) (Hebrews 10:10 [NASB] [NIV]) (Romans 3:21-26 [NASB] [NIV]) (Ephesians 2:11-16). In fact, the NIV translation of Romans 3:25 said that "God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement":
Jesus Christ was a human sacrifice to Ea/Ieue made to take away the sins of the believers. If you read my "The Demon Deity Unveiled" post, you'll find out that Ieue/Ea is Saturn, the god of human sacrifice.
Link:
The Demon Deity Unveiled:
https://demythifyinggod.blogspot.com/2022/10/was-yhwh-yahwehjehovah-angel.html
Vermes (1962 [1995 edition]) (PP. 159-160):
Matthew 26:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/matthew/26.htm
Hebrews 9:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/hebrews/9.htm
Hebrews 10:
-NASB:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/hebrews/10.htm
-NIV:
https://biblehub.com/niv/hebrews/10.htm
Romans 3:
-NASB
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/romans/3.htm
-NIV:
https://biblehub.com/niv/romans/3.htm
Ephesians 2:
https://biblehub.com/nasb_/ephesians/2.htm
Larson (1980) (P. xvii):
Part 4: Conclusions:
The real Jesus, or Joshua (Ieushuo), was the historical figure known as the "Egyptian" who was extant in the first-century A.D. He also seems to have been the apostle Paul. He was a member of the Essenes/Zealots, who also called themselves the Nazoraion, Ebionites, the Way, Sons of Light, etc. The Nazoraion were the founders of Nazareth. One can speculate that Jesus/"Egyptian" went to the Nazoraion after he returned to the Middle East from Egypt. Jesus/"Egyptian" saw him as a reincarnated Joshua son of Nun, and matches the Ephraimite Messiah/Messiah ben Joseph rather than the Orthodox Jewish Messiah. It's even stated in the Gospel of John that Jesus wasn't a descendant of David. Jesus was an ordinary man, as stated by the Ebionites and Nazoraion. This can be seen in their gospel, the Gospel according to the Hebrews. Jesus/"Egyptian" did see himself as a prophet and warrior, but he wasn't divine. Was Jesus the Orthodox Jewish Messiah? No. Based on the Jewish scriptures, Jesus didn't fulfill the Jewish Messianic prophecies or rules. The Herodians and Greco-Romans would later turn him into Jesus Christ, and those converts later became the Orthodox Christians. The Zealots rebelled against the Herodians, and the Romans. To counteract these Jewish rebels, Saul was probably ordered by the Herodians and Romans to create his own gospel. This is the Gospel of the Lord, which was probably an edited version of the Gospel according to the Hebrews. Saul was a Herodian himself, and his gospel has the Herodians and Romans being portrayed as loyal converters to, or followers of, Jesus Christ. Saul infiltrated the Essenes, converted some of them (namely the Nazoraion), and started his own movement. This became Christianity or "Pauline" Christianity, which was more Gentile-friendly. Later Orthodox Christian Fathers edited the gospels of the Ebionites and Saul in order to add in more story elements. Examples include the Annunciation, virgin birth, or an evil Herod the Great, a Jewish ancestry, etc., in order to satisfy a specific audience's beliefs and get them to convert. At the First Council of Nicaea, Jesus was turned into an official deity. As a deity, Jesus was turned into Dionysus mainly. The Archangel Michael sat on the right hand of the Jewish god, which fits with Jesus saying that he will sit on the right hand of God. Being the sun, Michael would also be Dionysus. This means that Jesus Christ, and the Archangel Michael, were the same individual as well. The body and blood of Jesus Christ is the body and blood of Dionysus. The death and bodily resurrection of Dionysus fits with the bodily death and resurrection of Jesus. The crown of thorns comes from Dionysus-Helios, and the purple cloak comes from Dionysus as well. Jesus Christ was also the gods Zeus-Hades, Seth, Hephaestus-Ptah-Osiris, and Anum-Uranus.
It is with a heavy heart that I must leave Jesus Christ behind. He was not real. The real Jesus, the "Egyptian," was a regular human being. The Jesus Christ of the gospels was manufactured.